Effectiveness of Biodress versus both honey and povidone-iodine ointment in acute wound healing in Enugu State, Nigeria: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of Biodress (a petroleum-based hydrogen-calcium salt of oxidised cellulose dressing made of organic materials; Bottu, Morocco) against both honey and povidone-iodine ointment on wound closure, the incidence of wound complications, the cost of wound care, ease of use, and the outcome of acute wounds. METHOD: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed among patients with acute wounds selected from two hospitals in southeast Nigeria. Participants were randomised with computer-generated numbers into one of three equally-sized groups: the petroleum-based dressing used as the intervention, and either honey or povidone-iodine which were used as two independent control groups. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included in this RCT, median age 32.5 years, with 22 male and 20 female patients. No significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of the petroleum-based dressing over honey or povidone-iodine ointment on wound closure (p=0.288). However, considering injury type, Biodress showed some advantage over honey in burns injuries (p=0.017). None of the participants in the intervention group had wound infection at any of the follow-up visits. No significant difference was noted in the cost of dressing materials (dressing packs and cleansing solutions) (p=0.717), or in the cost of dressing agents (Biodress/honey/ povidone-iodine) (p=0.222). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the ease of use of the different materials. The petroleum-based dressing, however, was significantly less painful than the other dressing agents and required significantly fewer dressing materials per episode compared to the other dressings (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In this RCT, Biodress demonstrated its potential as a promising dressing agent for acute wounds, particularly burns injuries; however, further studies will help to substantiate or disprove this finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wound Care
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.0159
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Biodress versus both honey and povidone-iodine ointment in acute wound healing in Enugu State, Nigeria: a randomised controlled trial

Wilson Ikpemhi Anetekhai, Paulina Chigwara Chikeme, Uwakwe C Mba, Ifeanyi I Onah et al.
Journal of Wound Care
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

Effectiveness of Biodress versus both honey and povidone-iodine ointment in acute wound healing in Enugu State, Nigeria: a randomised controlled trial

Wilson Ikpemhi Anetekhai, Paulina Chigwara Chikeme, Uwakwe C Mba, Ifeanyi I Onah, Agnes N Anarado, Chinweuba U Anthonia, Chinenye J Anetekhai
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of Biodress (a petroleum-based hydrogen-calcium salt of oxidised cellulose dressing made of organic materials; Bottu, Morocco) against both honey and povidone-iodine ointment on wound closure, the incidence of wound complications, the cost of wound care, ease of use, and the outcome of acute wounds. METHOD: A single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) was performed among patients with acute wounds selected from two hospitals in southeast Nigeria. Participants were randomised with computer-generated numbers into one of three equally-sized groups: the petroleum-based dressing used as the intervention, and either honey or povidone-iodine which were used as two independent control groups. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included in this RCT, median age 32.5 years, with 22 male and 20 female patients. No significant difference was observed in the effectiveness of the petroleum-based dressing over honey or povidone-iodine ointment on wound closure (p=0.288). However, considering injury type, Biodress showed some advantage over honey in burns injuries (p=0.017). None of the participants in the intervention group had wound infection at any of the follow-up visits. No significant difference was noted in the cost of dressing materials (dressing packs and cleansing solutions) (p=0.717), or in the cost of dressing agents (Biodress/honey/ povidone-iodine) (p=0.222). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the ease of use of the different materials. The petroleum-based dressing, however, was significantly less painful than the other dressing agents and required significantly fewer dressing materials per episode compared to the other dressings (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In this RCT, Biodress demonstrated its potential as a promising dressing agent for acute wounds, particularly burns injuries; however, further studies will help to substantiate or disprove this finding.

Journal of Wound CareVol. 35(Sup5a)
Abia State University (NG), University of Nigeria (NG), Birmingham City University (GB), Enugu State University of Science and Technology (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.