Women veterans’ experiences of veteran-specific support services: an international scoping review

BACKGROUND: The growing proportion of women in veteran communities internationally highlights a rising need for veteran support services tailored to their unique experiences. Despite this, support services remain predominantly designed for men, leading to underutilization and dissatisfaction among women veterans. This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive international review of the current state of knowledge regarding the experiences of women veterans in accessing and engaging with veteran-specific support services. METHODS: This study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Five databases were searched for papers published from 2000 onwards. Studies reporting on barriers and/or facilitators to access and experiences of engaging with veteran-specific support services reported by women veterans were included. There were no limitations on study methodology or country of origin, and all publications reporting primary research were included. RESULTS: A total of 117 studies were included in the review. This research originated predominantly from the US (n = 109), with seven UK papers, and one Canadian. Eleven themes were identified across the literature, highlighting gendered barriers and facilitators of accessing veteran-specific support for women. Women veterans report feelings of discomfort, exclusion, and discrimination within veteran services, which are perceived as being set up and designed for men. Women report experiencing stigma in help-seeking compounded by a perception of feminine weakness experienced during military service. Some women didn't want to access services they saw as military-adjacent, due to gendered adverse experiences during military service, including discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence. A lack of identification with the term 'veteran' further hinders women's engagement with veteran-specific services. Enablers of access include care that is sensitive to women's needs, trauma-informed service user-provider relationships, and peer support. CONCLUSION: The reviewed evidence suggests women experience unique challenges and needs in accessing veteran-specific services. Support services should focus on developing care that is, culturally competent, trauma-informed and sensitive to the needs of women, to address gendered barriers to engagement. More research is needed to confirm these research findings outside of the US context, and incorporating an intersectional lens in future research will be essential for improving the support systems for women veterans internationally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04512-0
Primary Topic
Education and Military Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Women veterans’ experiences of veteran-specific support services: an international scoping review

Abigail Adams, Matt Fossey, Louise Morgan, Claire Hooks et al.
BMC Women s Health
Education and Military Integration
article

Women veterans’ experiences of veteran-specific support services: an international scoping review

Abigail Adams, Matt Fossey, Louise Morgan, Claire Hooks, Ellie Buxton, Lauren Godier-McBard
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growing proportion of women in veteran communities internationally highlights a rising need for veteran support services tailored to their unique experiences. Despite this, support services remain predominantly designed for men, leading to underutilization and dissatisfaction among women veterans. This scoping review aimed to provide a comprehensive international review of the current state of knowledge regarding the experiences of women veterans in accessing and engaging with veteran-specific support services. METHODS: This study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Five databases were searched for papers published from 2000 onwards. Studies reporting on barriers and/or facilitators to access and experiences of engaging with veteran-specific support services reported by women veterans were included. There were no limitations on study methodology or country of origin, and all publications reporting primary research were included. RESULTS: A total of 117 studies were included in the review. This research originated predominantly from the US (n = 109), with seven UK papers, and one Canadian. Eleven themes were identified across the literature, highlighting gendered barriers and facilitators of accessing veteran-specific support for women. Women veterans report feelings of discomfort, exclusion, and discrimination within veteran services, which are perceived as being set up and designed for men. Women report experiencing stigma in help-seeking compounded by a perception of feminine weakness experienced during military service. Some women didn't want to access services they saw as military-adjacent, due to gendered adverse experiences during military service, including discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence. A lack of identification with the term 'veteran' further hinders women's engagement with veteran-specific services. Enablers of access include care that is sensitive to women's needs, trauma-informed service user-provider relationships, and peer support. CONCLUSION: The reviewed evidence suggests women experience unique challenges and needs in accessing veteran-specific services. Support services should focus on developing care that is, culturally competent, trauma-informed and sensitive to the needs of women, to address gendered barriers to engagement. More research is needed to confirm these research findings outside of the US context, and incorporating an intersectional lens in future research will be essential for improving the support systems for women veterans internationally.

BMC Women s Health
Loughborough University (GB), Community Care (US), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Education and Military Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.