Efficacy of Multi-Domain Telerehabilitation in Patients with Stroke: A Non-Inferiority, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveAlthough telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising and accessible alternative to traditional in-person therapy, robust evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness across multiple functional domains remains limited. We tested the non-inferiority of synchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation for motor, cognitive, language, and disability outcomes in stroke survivors.DesignBicentric, single-blind (assessor-blinded), randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.MethodsFifty-six participants were randomized to home-based telerehabilitation or conventional outpatient therapy. Both groups completed twenty real-time supervised sessions over four weeks. The primary outcome was change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-extremity motor score (0-66); secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment lower-extremity motor (0-34), Aachen Aphasia Test (Italian version) naming/written language/comprehension, Oxford Cognitive Screen orientation and memory subtests, and Barthel Index. Non-inferiority was evaluated using a prespecified margin (Δ=-5.2) and confidence-interval-based linear mixed-effects models (per-protocol primary, intention-to-treat sensitivity); non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the adjusted between-group contrast at T1 (telerehabilitation minus conventional) was > -Δ.ResultsThe adjusted between-group difference in change for the primary outcome was compatible with non-inferiority at post-treatment, with consistent results in sensitivity analyses. No significant between-group differences were observed in language, cognitive, or functional independence outcomes, and findings were similar at one-month follow-up.ConclusionsSynchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation appears feasible and yields short-term motor recovery comparable to standard outpatient rehabilitation within a prespecified non-inferiority framework. Interpretation is limited by the short follow-up and restricted cognitive outcome coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261445401
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Multi-Domain Telerehabilitation in Patients with Stroke: A Non-Inferiority, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Elisa Evangelista, Valentina Varalta, Michela Agostini, Sara Federico et al.
Neurorehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Efficacy of Multi-Domain Telerehabilitation in Patients with Stroke: A Non-Inferiority, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Elisa Evangelista, Valentina Varalta, Michela Agostini, Sara Federico, Luisa Cacciante, Nicola Smania, Paolo Tonin, Claudia Giacomozzi, Cristina Fonte, Anna Righetti, Mirko Filippetti, Alessia Carletto, Andrea Turolla, Rita Di Censo, Alessandro Picelli, Pawel Kiper
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveAlthough telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising and accessible alternative to traditional in-person therapy, robust evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness across multiple functional domains remains limited. We tested the non-inferiority of synchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation for motor, cognitive, language, and disability outcomes in stroke survivors.DesignBicentric, single-blind (assessor-blinded), randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.MethodsFifty-six participants were randomized to home-based telerehabilitation or conventional outpatient therapy. Both groups completed twenty real-time supervised sessions over four weeks. The primary outcome was change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-extremity motor score (0-66); secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment lower-extremity motor (0-34), Aachen Aphasia Test (Italian version) naming/written language/comprehension, Oxford Cognitive Screen orientation and memory subtests, and Barthel Index. Non-inferiority was evaluated using a prespecified margin (Δ=-5.2) and confidence-interval-based linear mixed-effects models (per-protocol primary, intention-to-treat sensitivity); non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the adjusted between-group contrast at T1 (telerehabilitation minus conventional) was > -Δ.ResultsThe adjusted between-group difference in change for the primary outcome was compatible with non-inferiority at post-treatment, with consistent results in sensitivity analyses. No significant between-group differences were observed in language, cognitive, or functional independence outcomes, and findings were similar at one-month follow-up.ConclusionsSynchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation appears feasible and yields short-term motor recovery comparable to standard outpatient rehabilitation within a prespecified non-inferiority framework. Interpretation is limited by the short follow-up and restricted cognitive outcome coverage.

Neurorehabilitation
University of Verona (IT), University of Padua (IT), Canadian Armed Forces (CA), Istituto S.Anna Crotone (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), National Institute of Health (AM), IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.