Efficacy of Multi-Domain Telerehabilitation in Patients with Stroke: A Non-Inferiority, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
ObjectiveAlthough telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising and accessible alternative to traditional in-person therapy, robust evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness across multiple functional domains remains limited. We tested the non-inferiority of synchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation for motor, cognitive, language, and disability outcomes in stroke survivors.DesignBicentric, single-blind (assessor-blinded), randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.MethodsFifty-six participants were randomized to home-based telerehabilitation or conventional outpatient therapy. Both groups completed twenty real-time supervised sessions over four weeks. The primary outcome was change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-extremity motor score (0-66); secondary outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment lower-extremity motor (0-34), Aachen Aphasia Test (Italian version) naming/written language/comprehension, Oxford Cognitive Screen orientation and memory subtests, and Barthel Index. Non-inferiority was evaluated using a prespecified margin (Δ=-5.2) and confidence-interval-based linear mixed-effects models (per-protocol primary, intention-to-treat sensitivity); non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the adjusted between-group contrast at T1 (telerehabilitation minus conventional) was > -Δ.ResultsThe adjusted between-group difference in change for the primary outcome was compatible with non-inferiority at post-treatment, with consistent results in sensitivity analyses. No significant between-group differences were observed in language, cognitive, or functional independence outcomes, and findings were similar at one-month follow-up.ConclusionsSynchronous multi-domain telerehabilitation appears feasible and yields short-term motor recovery comparable to standard outpatient rehabilitation within a prespecified non-inferiority framework. Interpretation is limited by the short follow-up and restricted cognitive outcome coverage.
Authors
- Elisa Evangelista (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0852-9066)
- Valentina Varalta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-8497)
- Michela Agostini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-3338)
- Sara Federico (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-5755)
- Luisa Cacciante (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8662-9253)
- Nicola Smania (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-1887)
- Paolo Tonin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-1378)
- Claudia Giacomozzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-4934)
- Cristina Fonte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-7445)
- Anna Righetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-2647)
- Mirko Filippetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5930-5974)
- Alessia Carletto
- Andrea Turolla
- Rita Di Censo
- Alessandro Picelli
- Pawel Kiper
Institutions
- University of Verona (IT)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Canadian Armed Forces (CA)
- Istituto S.Anna Crotone (IT)
- Azienda USL di Bologna (IT)
- National Institute of Health (AM)
- IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neurorehabilitation
- Published
- 2026-05-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261445401
- Primary Topic
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Ministero della Salute