Follow-up effects of exercise-based interventions on physical performance in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Physical performance impairments are common in cancer survivors and can limit daily activities, quality of life, and long-term health. Although structured exercise programs have proven beneficial for improving physical performance, maintenance of these benefits is unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate whether improvements in physical performance are maintained following structured exercise oncology interventions. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and March 2025. Eligible trials engaged adult cancer survivors in structured exercise interventions and reported objective measures of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and/or walking capacity at the end of the intervention and ≥ 3 months after program completion. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses with weighted mean differences (WMD) used to summarize effects. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs (2289 participants; mean follow-up post-intervention = 8 months) were included. Exercise significantly improved cardiorespiratory fitness at post-intervention (WMD = + 1.76 ml/kg/min; p = 0.008); however, improvements were attenuated at follow-up (WMD = + 1.24 ml/kg/min; p = 0.130). Similarly, upper and lower body strength improved post-intervention (WMD = + 3.35 kg; p = 0.001; WMD = + 12.7 kg; p = 0.045), but effects diminished at follow-up (WMD = + 1.80 kg; p = 0.081; WMD = + 10.0 kg; p = 0.093). In contrast, walking capacity increased post-intervention (WMD = + 40.3 m; p = 0.002) and remained elevated at follow-up (WMD = + 49.4 m; p = 0.006). Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low across outcomes, primarily due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision in effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Structured exercise interventions were found to produce short-term improvements in physical performance among cancer survivors. Although gains in cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength appeared to persist at follow-up, they were attenuated compared with post-intervention and supported by very low certainty evidence. In contrast, walking capacity demonstrated sustained improvements at follow-up, though the certainty of evidence remained low. Future work is needed to identify longer-term effects (> 12 months) and develop strategies to better maintain improved physical performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While exercise programs can improve physical performance, these benefits may not persist without ongoing support. Cancer survivors should be encouraged to continue self-directed exercise after program completion, and exercise programs should incorporate strategies to maintain longer-term improvements in physical performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-026-02030-4
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Follow-up effects of exercise-based interventions on physical performance in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Madelin R. Siedler, Ciaran M. Fairman, Sarah Burkart, Mark A. Sarzynski et al.
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Follow-up effects of exercise-based interventions on physical performance in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Madelin R. Siedler, Ciaran M. Fairman, Sarah Burkart, Mark A. Sarzynski, Nathan H. Parker, Alexander M. Brooks, Brent Cunningham
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Physical performance impairments are common in cancer survivors and can limit daily activities, quality of life, and long-term health. Although structured exercise programs have proven beneficial for improving physical performance, maintenance of these benefits is unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate whether improvements in physical performance are maintained following structured exercise oncology interventions. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and March 2025. Eligible trials engaged adult cancer survivors in structured exercise interventions and reported objective measures of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and/or walking capacity at the end of the intervention and ≥ 3 months after program completion. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses with weighted mean differences (WMD) used to summarize effects. RESULTS: Twenty-four RCTs (2289 participants; mean follow-up post-intervention = 8 months) were included. Exercise significantly improved cardiorespiratory fitness at post-intervention (WMD = + 1.76 ml/kg/min; p = 0.008); however, improvements were attenuated at follow-up (WMD = + 1.24 ml/kg/min; p = 0.130). Similarly, upper and lower body strength improved post-intervention (WMD = + 3.35 kg; p = 0.001; WMD = + 12.7 kg; p = 0.045), but effects diminished at follow-up (WMD = + 1.80 kg; p = 0.081; WMD = + 10.0 kg; p = 0.093). In contrast, walking capacity increased post-intervention (WMD = + 40.3 m; p = 0.002) and remained elevated at follow-up (WMD = + 49.4 m; p = 0.006). Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low across outcomes, primarily due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision in effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Structured exercise interventions were found to produce short-term improvements in physical performance among cancer survivors. Although gains in cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength appeared to persist at follow-up, they were attenuated compared with post-intervention and supported by very low certainty evidence. In contrast, walking capacity demonstrated sustained improvements at follow-up, though the certainty of evidence remained low. Future work is needed to identify longer-term effects (> 12 months) and develop strategies to better maintain improved physical performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While exercise programs can improve physical performance, these benefits may not persist without ongoing support. Cancer survivors should be encouraged to continue self-directed exercise after program completion, and exercise programs should incorporate strategies to maintain longer-term improvements in physical performance.

Journal of Cancer Survivorship
University of South Carolina (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University (US)
University of South Carolina
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.