Identification and verification of worst-case radiological transport scenarios for Ireland: A simulation-based approach to nuclear emergency preparedness (2011–2024)

This study presents a comprehensive simulation-based assessment of potential transboundary radiological transport to Ireland from six nuclear facilities in the United Kingdom and France, utilising weather data over a fourteen-year period (2011-2024). Systematic screening of 2.2 million HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion simulations identified eighteen worst-case scenarios representing maximum ground deposition, maximum air concentration, and minimum warning time. Independent verification using FLEXPART and HYSPLIT demonstrated expected inter-model variability (factor of 1-10), with both Lagrangian models providing consistent risk assessment brackets. Heysham, despite its complex 19-isotope AGR source term, produced negligible radiological doses to Ireland (<0.01 mSv), substantially below intervention thresholds. More distant continental facilities (Flamanville, Paluel, Sizewell B) showed low but measurable doses (0.1-4.6 mSv), remaining well below the 50 mSv sheltering threshold. This study addresses urgent-phase protective actions only; transitional-phase food chain countermeasures are beyond scope. Hinkley Point C (under construction) showed elevated but sub-threshold doses (0.3-8.5 mSv). However, the cancelled Wylfa Newydd gigawatt-scale project (the site is now proposed for small modular reactors), owing to its extreme proximity to Ireland, exhibited concerning dose predictions: FLEXPART calculated 19.6 mSv under maximum deposition conditions (May 2024 scenario), approaching the 50 mSv sheltering threshold, whilst HYSPLIT predicted 4.5 mSv. This inter-model variability (factor of ∼5) highlights genuine uncertainty for near-source impacts but converges on a critical finding: were a gigawatt-scale reactor constructed at the Wylfa site, severe accidents during specific meteorological patterns could require protective actions in Ireland. Machine learning models (XGBoost) achieved validation accuracies of 85-93% for rapid impact prediction, whilst global sensitivity analysis revealed that meteorological conditions, rather than release parameters, dominate consequence severity. These findings provide quantitative assurance that existing nuclear infrastructure poses low transboundary risk to Ireland well below urgent-phase intervention thresholds (sheltering and evacuation), whilst demonstrating that facility proximity constitutes the dominant factor determining potential radiological impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181817
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and verification of worst-case radiological transport scenarios for Ireland: A simulation-based approach to nuclear emergency preparedness (2011–2024)

Marc Sturrock, Kevin Kelleher, Robert Ryan
The Science of The Total Environment
Radioactive contamination and transfer
article

Identification and verification of worst-case radiological transport scenarios for Ireland: A simulation-based approach to nuclear emergency preparedness (2011–2024)

Marc Sturrock, Kevin Kelleher, Robert Ryan
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive simulation-based assessment of potential transboundary radiological transport to Ireland from six nuclear facilities in the United Kingdom and France, utilising weather data over a fourteen-year period (2011-2024). Systematic screening of 2.2 million HYSPLIT atmospheric dispersion simulations identified eighteen worst-case scenarios representing maximum ground deposition, maximum air concentration, and minimum warning time. Independent verification using FLEXPART and HYSPLIT demonstrated expected inter-model variability (factor of 1-10), with both Lagrangian models providing consistent risk assessment brackets. Heysham, despite its complex 19-isotope AGR source term, produced negligible radiological doses to Ireland (<0.01 mSv), substantially below intervention thresholds. More distant continental facilities (Flamanville, Paluel, Sizewell B) showed low but measurable doses (0.1-4.6 mSv), remaining well below the 50 mSv sheltering threshold. This study addresses urgent-phase protective actions only; transitional-phase food chain countermeasures are beyond scope. Hinkley Point C (under construction) showed elevated but sub-threshold doses (0.3-8.5 mSv). However, the cancelled Wylfa Newydd gigawatt-scale project (the site is now proposed for small modular reactors), owing to its extreme proximity to Ireland, exhibited concerning dose predictions: FLEXPART calculated 19.6 mSv under maximum deposition conditions (May 2024 scenario), approaching the 50 mSv sheltering threshold, whilst HYSPLIT predicted 4.5 mSv. This inter-model variability (factor of ∼5) highlights genuine uncertainty for near-source impacts but converges on a critical finding: were a gigawatt-scale reactor constructed at the Wylfa site, severe accidents during specific meteorological patterns could require protective actions in Ireland. Machine learning models (XGBoost) achieved validation accuracies of 85-93% for rapid impact prediction, whilst global sensitivity analysis revealed that meteorological conditions, rather than release parameters, dominate consequence severity. These findings provide quantitative assurance that existing nuclear infrastructure poses low transboundary risk to Ireland well below urgent-phase intervention thresholds (sheltering and evacuation), whilst demonstrating that facility proximity constitutes the dominant factor determining potential radiological impact.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 1033
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Environmental Protection Agency (IE)
Science Foundation Ireland
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.