Efficacy and safety of low- and high-intensity magnetic field therapies for orthopedic pain: a systematic review

Introduction: Orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and many patients continue to experience suboptimal relief despite advances in pharmacological and physical therapies. Magnetic field–based interventions, including pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS), have emerged as non-invasive approaches for pain modulation and functional improvement. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-intensity (PEMF) and high-intensity (rPMS) magnetic field therapies in adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods Randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies compared PEMF or rPMS with sham, placebo, or standard care and reported outcomes related to pain intensity, functional performance, and safety. Results Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies reported reductions in pain and improvements in functional outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index and WOMAC. No serious adverse events were reported. PEMF was primarily linked to sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, whereas rPMS showed faster pain reduction, likely related to neuromuscular activation and modulation of descending inhibitory pathways. Some studies reported greater benefits using higher stimulation intensities or combining therapy with exercise. Discussion Magnetic field therapies appear to be safe and well tolerated, with potential benefits for pain and function for the management of musculoskeletal pain. Their complementary mechanisms suggest potential clinical synergy; however, larger and more standardized trials are needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effectiveness. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251170876 , PROSPERO CRD420251170876.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pain Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1760721
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of low- and high-intensity magnetic field therapies for orthopedic pain: a systematic review

Jobson Dias Batista, Gabrielly Santos Pereira, Ludimila Dias Silva, Joelington Dias Batista
Frontiers in Pain Research
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Efficacy and safety of low- and high-intensity magnetic field therapies for orthopedic pain: a systematic review

Jobson Dias Batista, Gabrielly Santos Pereira, Ludimila Dias Silva, Joelington Dias Batista
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and many patients continue to experience suboptimal relief despite advances in pharmacological and physical therapies. Magnetic field–based interventions, including pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS), have emerged as non-invasive approaches for pain modulation and functional improvement. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-intensity (PEMF) and high-intensity (rPMS) magnetic field therapies in adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods Randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2025 were identified through searches in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies compared PEMF or rPMS with sham, placebo, or standard care and reported outcomes related to pain intensity, functional performance, and safety. Results Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies reported reductions in pain and improvements in functional outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index and WOMAC. No serious adverse events were reported. PEMF was primarily linked to sustained analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, whereas rPMS showed faster pain reduction, likely related to neuromuscular activation and modulation of descending inhibitory pathways. Some studies reported greater benefits using higher stimulation intensities or combining therapy with exercise. Discussion Magnetic field therapies appear to be safe and well tolerated, with potential benefits for pain and function for the management of musculoskeletal pain. Their complementary mechanisms suggest potential clinical synergy; however, larger and more standardized trials are needed to establish optimal protocols and long-term effectiveness. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251170876 , PROSPERO CRD420251170876.

Frontiers in Pain ResearchVol. 7
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR), Pain Management Institute (US), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.