Evaluating the Impact of a Dedicated Dissection Course on 3‐D Anatomical Understanding in Senior Medical Students

International changes in the focus of medical school education have led to a decrease in the time allocated to anatomy education, with human specimen dissection particularly affected. This study evaluates whether a dissection-based course facilitates the retention of three-dimensional (3-D) anatomical relationships in senior medical students who previously completed anatomy training without dissection. Fifteen year 4 or 5 medical students, who had completed preclinical anatomy instruction and 1 or 2 years of clinical training, were competitively selected to undertake a Clinical Anatomy Intercalation programme that included a 16-week full body human specimen dissection course. Participants completed four assessments administered before, midway through, at the end, and 1 month after the dissection course. Each assessment had 24 questions based on six prosection images representing major body regions. Half of the questions assessed anatomical identification, while the reminder evaluated 3-D understanding of anatomy. A post-course Likert scale questionnaire captured participants' perceptions of dissection as a learning tool. Overall test scores improved across the first three assessments, with questions relating to 3-D anatomical understanding showing a statistical improvement with each sequential in-course test. No statistically significant difference was observed between end of course and one-month post-course tests, indicating knowledge retention. Performance was significantly lower in head and neck anatomy compared to thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions (p < 0.001). Likert scale questionnaire responses indicated strong participant support for dissection as an education tool. This study demonstrates that a dissection-based anatomy course significantly enhances 3D anatomical knowledge gain and supports retention, which senior medical students can apply in clinical practice. Participants highly valued the experience, suggesting that dissection is still a vital component of medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Anatomy
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70133
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of a Dedicated Dissection Course on 3‐D Anatomical Understanding in Senior Medical Students

T Stubley, Robert S. Stephenson, James Wooding, JL Marshall et al.
Clinical Anatomy
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Evaluating the Impact of a Dedicated Dissection Course on 3‐D Anatomical Understanding in Senior Medical Students

T Stubley, Robert S. Stephenson, James Wooding, JL Marshall, Karuna Katti
article en

Abstract

International changes in the focus of medical school education have led to a decrease in the time allocated to anatomy education, with human specimen dissection particularly affected. This study evaluates whether a dissection-based course facilitates the retention of three-dimensional (3-D) anatomical relationships in senior medical students who previously completed anatomy training without dissection. Fifteen year 4 or 5 medical students, who had completed preclinical anatomy instruction and 1 or 2 years of clinical training, were competitively selected to undertake a Clinical Anatomy Intercalation programme that included a 16-week full body human specimen dissection course. Participants completed four assessments administered before, midway through, at the end, and 1 month after the dissection course. Each assessment had 24 questions based on six prosection images representing major body regions. Half of the questions assessed anatomical identification, while the reminder evaluated 3-D understanding of anatomy. A post-course Likert scale questionnaire captured participants' perceptions of dissection as a learning tool. Overall test scores improved across the first three assessments, with questions relating to 3-D anatomical understanding showing a statistical improvement with each sequential in-course test. No statistically significant difference was observed between end of course and one-month post-course tests, indicating knowledge retention. Performance was significantly lower in head and neck anatomy compared to thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic regions (p < 0.001). Likert scale questionnaire responses indicated strong participant support for dissection as an education tool. This study demonstrates that a dissection-based anatomy course significantly enhances 3D anatomical knowledge gain and supports retention, which senior medical students can apply in clinical practice. Participants highly valued the experience, suggesting that dissection is still a vital component of medical education.

Clinical Anatomy
Lancaster University (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.