Outcomes in pediatric recipients of ABO-incompatible liver transplants: An analysis of the SPLIT registry

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is standard of care for children with end-stage liver disease, but waitlist mortality remains high, especially among infants. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) LT offers a strategy to expand the donor pool, though concerns over antibody-mediated rejection have limited widespread use. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of ABO-I LT recipients using the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry from 2011-2022, a prospective, multicenter database capturing over 75% of pediatric LTs in the United States and Canada. Clinical characteristics, post-transplant complications, and graft and patient survival were compared between matched ABO-I and ABO-compatible (ABO-C) recipients. ABO-I transplant recipients were matched 1:5 with ABO-C recipients using year of transplant, age and clinical status at the time of transplant. A center-level survey assessed institutional practices regarding ABO-I LT. RESULTS: Among 3,372 pediatric LT recipients, 155 received ABO-I grafts and were matched to 775 recipients of ABO-C grafts. ABO-I recipients had higher rates of ventilator support, parenteral nutrition, and ICU care at time of transplant compared to ABO-C recipients. There was no statistically significant difference in three-year graft (87.8% vs. 92.6%, p=0.06) or patient survival (93.9% vs. 96.6%, p=0.11) between ABO-I and ABO-C groups. In children ≤2 years of age, there was a higher incidence of early portal venous thrombosis in the ABO-I group (8.5% vs. 3.7%, p=0.025). Survey responses revealed substantial variability in center ABO-I eligibility criteria, desensitization protocols, and immunosuppressive strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for pediatric ABO-I and ABO-C LT recipients within the SPLIT registry are comparable, supporting broader implementation of ABO-I LT to reduce pediatric waitlist mortality. Variability in institutional practices underscores the need for prospective studies to inform standardized protocols and optimize outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000000887
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes in pediatric recipients of ABO-incompatible liver transplants: An analysis of the SPLIT registry

Krupa R. Mysore, Ravinder Anand, Sarah M. Bedoyan, Sarah G. Anderson et al.
Liver Transplantation
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Outcomes in pediatric recipients of ABO-incompatible liver transplants: An analysis of the SPLIT registry

Krupa R. Mysore, Ravinder Anand, Sarah M. Bedoyan, Sarah G. Anderson, James E. Squires, Bridget Whitehead, Catherine A. Chapin, Jeffery Mitchell, the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT)
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is standard of care for children with end-stage liver disease, but waitlist mortality remains high, especially among infants. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) LT offers a strategy to expand the donor pool, though concerns over antibody-mediated rejection have limited widespread use. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes of ABO-I LT recipients using the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry from 2011-2022, a prospective, multicenter database capturing over 75% of pediatric LTs in the United States and Canada. Clinical characteristics, post-transplant complications, and graft and patient survival were compared between matched ABO-I and ABO-compatible (ABO-C) recipients. ABO-I transplant recipients were matched 1:5 with ABO-C recipients using year of transplant, age and clinical status at the time of transplant. A center-level survey assessed institutional practices regarding ABO-I LT. RESULTS: Among 3,372 pediatric LT recipients, 155 received ABO-I grafts and were matched to 775 recipients of ABO-C grafts. ABO-I recipients had higher rates of ventilator support, parenteral nutrition, and ICU care at time of transplant compared to ABO-C recipients. There was no statistically significant difference in three-year graft (87.8% vs. 92.6%, p=0.06) or patient survival (93.9% vs. 96.6%, p=0.11) between ABO-I and ABO-C groups. In children ≤2 years of age, there was a higher incidence of early portal venous thrombosis in the ABO-I group (8.5% vs. 3.7%, p=0.025). Survey responses revealed substantial variability in center ABO-I eligibility criteria, desensitization protocols, and immunosuppressive strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for pediatric ABO-I and ABO-C LT recipients within the SPLIT registry are comparable, supporting broader implementation of ABO-I LT to reduce pediatric waitlist mortality. Variability in institutional practices underscores the need for prospective studies to inform standardized protocols and optimize outcomes.

Liver Transplantation
Alkermes (Ireland) (IE), Baylor College of Medicine (US), UPMC Health System (US), Emmes (United States) (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.