Policy Pathways to Digitalization: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China’s Construction Industry

Understanding how policy mixes influence systemic digital transformation is a key concern in socio-technical transition research. This study explores the configurational effects of policy tools in construction digitalization to address this issue. Based on an analysis of policies issued across 31 Chinese provinces (2020–2025), key policy tools were identified using a Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), followed by fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine their configurational effects. The results show that: (1) policies can be grouped into three categories—technology application, management norms, and industrial ecology—comprising six thematic tools; (2) no single condition is essential for high or low digital development; (3) high-level outcomes are associated with three distinct configurations: “technology-talent driven”, “foundation-governance linkage”, and “system-ecology leading”, while “factor-deficient” and “system-mismatched” types are frequently linked to low-level outcomes. By identifying equifinal pathways and cross-level coordination mechanisms, the study offers configurational insights for designing digital policy mixes. While the theoretical implications are broadly applicable, the specific configurations require validation across different contexts because they depend on China’s provincial policy data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091772
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Pathways to Digitalization: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China’s Construction Industry

Fengtao Liu, Jielin Wei
Buildings
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Policy Pathways to Digitalization: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China’s Construction Industry

Fengtao Liu, Jielin Wei
article en

Abstract

Understanding how policy mixes influence systemic digital transformation is a key concern in socio-technical transition research. This study explores the configurational effects of policy tools in construction digitalization to address this issue. Based on an analysis of policies issued across 31 Chinese provinces (2020–2025), key policy tools were identified using a Multi-Level Perspective (MLP), followed by fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to examine their configurational effects. The results show that: (1) policies can be grouped into three categories—technology application, management norms, and industrial ecology—comprising six thematic tools; (2) no single condition is essential for high or low digital development; (3) high-level outcomes are associated with three distinct configurations: “technology-talent driven”, “foundation-governance linkage”, and “system-ecology leading”, while “factor-deficient” and “system-mismatched” types are frequently linked to low-level outcomes. By identifying equifinal pathways and cross-level coordination mechanisms, the study offers configurational insights for designing digital policy mixes. While the theoretical implications are broadly applicable, the specific configurations require validation across different contexts because they depend on China’s provincial policy data.

BuildingsVol. 16(9)
Guangxi University of Science and Technology (CN), Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Liuzhou General Hospital (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.