Effects of different physical training models on physical preparation in school physical education

Introduction: Physical preparation is fundamental to school PE, yet heterogeneity exists in the effectiveness of various training models for adolescent fitness, with few empirical comparisons in real educational settings. Objective: This study compared the effects of HIIT, resistance, combined aerobic-resistance, and circuit training on multidimensional physical preparation in secondary school students. Methodology: A 12-week quasi-experimental parallel study included 156 adolescents aged 13–16, cluster-randomized into four intervention groups and one control group (n=39 each). Physical preparation was assessed via cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, endurance, speed-agility and flexibility. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc tests and effect size calculation. Results: Significant Time × Group interactions were observed across all variables (p < 0.001, η²p = 0.18–0.34). High-intensity interval training produced the largest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (ΔVO₂max = +4.2 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, d = 1.15). Resistance training maximized strength and power development (d = 0.91–0.98). Circuit-based training demonstrated superior muscular endurance (d = 0.96–1.02) and speed-agility improvements (d = 0.87). Combined training generated the most balanced adaptations across domains (mean d = 0.82, SD = 0.09). Post-pubertal participants showed significantly greater strength gains across all models (p < 0.05). Discussion: The findings confirmed distinct domain-specific physiological adaptations across training models, consistent with training specificity literature. Results highlighted the importance of tailored training strategies for targeted physical outcomes in education. Conclusion: Different training models yield specific performance benefits; therefore, schools should implement structured, periodized, and outcome-oriented training programs, with combined and circuit-based approaches offering the most comprehensive physical development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v78.118757
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of different physical training models on physical preparation in school physical education

Tolegenuly Nurzhan, Liu Yu
Retos
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effects of different physical training models on physical preparation in school physical education

Tolegenuly Nurzhan, Liu Yu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Physical preparation is fundamental to school PE, yet heterogeneity exists in the effectiveness of various training models for adolescent fitness, with few empirical comparisons in real educational settings. Objective: This study compared the effects of HIIT, resistance, combined aerobic-resistance, and circuit training on multidimensional physical preparation in secondary school students. Methodology: A 12-week quasi-experimental parallel study included 156 adolescents aged 13–16, cluster-randomized into four intervention groups and one control group (n=39 each). Physical preparation was assessed via cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, endurance, speed-agility and flexibility. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc tests and effect size calculation. Results: Significant Time × Group interactions were observed across all variables (p < 0.001, η²p = 0.18–0.34). High-intensity interval training produced the largest improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (ΔVO₂max = +4.2 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹, d = 1.15). Resistance training maximized strength and power development (d = 0.91–0.98). Circuit-based training demonstrated superior muscular endurance (d = 0.96–1.02) and speed-agility improvements (d = 0.87). Combined training generated the most balanced adaptations across domains (mean d = 0.82, SD = 0.09). Post-pubertal participants showed significantly greater strength gains across all models (p < 0.05). Discussion: The findings confirmed distinct domain-specific physiological adaptations across training models, consistent with training specificity literature. Results highlighted the importance of tailored training strategies for targeted physical outcomes in education. Conclusion: Different training models yield specific performance benefits; therefore, schools should implement structured, periodized, and outcome-oriented training programs, with combined and circuit-based approaches offering the most comprehensive physical development.

RetosVol. 78
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.