Machine Learning for Local Detection of Separators in Three‐Dimensional Magnetic Fields

Abstract Magnetic reconnection is a major plasma phenomenon occurring in various key environments ranging from the Sun and near‐Earth space to astrophysical plasmas. While magnetic reconnection is relatively well‐understood under two‐dimensional (2D) settings, it remains challenging to characterize in three‐dimensional (3D) magnetic fields. In the 3D setting, such as in the Earth's magnetotail, magnetic reconnection tends to occur along separators, which are special field lines derived from the global topology of the magnetic field. However, current global approaches to locating separators can be computationally inefficient or provide inconsistent results on more complex magnetic fields. On the other hand, while local approaches do exist, they often liken the 3D magnetic field to a 2.5D field, where one of the three field components is assumed to be negligible, which is not always accurate. We employ two different types of machine learning approaches for local identification of the separators of 3D magnetic fields without the explicit assumption of a 2.5D setting. We compare the performance of these methods to those of a global approach and a local 2.5D approach. As a result, we show that, when trained on the separator output of an existing global approach, the machine learning methods can locate separators from large‐scale simulated magnetotail data. In addition, compared to the global approach, the machine learning methods provide a notable speed‐up in computation time and increased consistency of outputs over adjacent simulation time steps. Finally, we provide analysis on where each of the considered separator identification methods tends to succeed or fail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jh001202
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning for Local Detection of Separators in Three‐Dimensional Magnetic Fields

Markku Alho, Teemu Roos, Fanni Franssila, Ioanna Bouri et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Machine Learning for Local Detection of Separators in Three‐Dimensional Magnetic Fields

Markku Alho, Teemu Roos, Fanni Franssila, Ioanna Bouri, Daniel Holmberg, Minna Palmroth
article en

Abstract

Abstract Magnetic reconnection is a major plasma phenomenon occurring in various key environments ranging from the Sun and near‐Earth space to astrophysical plasmas. While magnetic reconnection is relatively well‐understood under two‐dimensional (2D) settings, it remains challenging to characterize in three‐dimensional (3D) magnetic fields. In the 3D setting, such as in the Earth's magnetotail, magnetic reconnection tends to occur along separators, which are special field lines derived from the global topology of the magnetic field. However, current global approaches to locating separators can be computationally inefficient or provide inconsistent results on more complex magnetic fields. On the other hand, while local approaches do exist, they often liken the 3D magnetic field to a 2.5D field, where one of the three field components is assumed to be negligible, which is not always accurate. We employ two different types of machine learning approaches for local identification of the separators of 3D magnetic fields without the explicit assumption of a 2.5D setting. We compare the performance of these methods to those of a global approach and a local 2.5D approach. As a result, we show that, when trained on the separator output of an existing global approach, the machine learning methods can locate separators from large‐scale simulated magnetotail data. In addition, compared to the global approach, the machine learning methods provide a notable speed‐up in computation time and increased consistency of outputs over adjacent simulation time steps. Finally, we provide analysis on where each of the considered separator identification methods tends to succeed or fail.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 3(3)
University of Helsinki (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.