Agentic Systems Framework (ASF)

A research framework for adaptive, purposeful agents under uncertainty — integrating control theory, causal inference, information theory, and agent architecture under a common formalism. ASF formalizes the adaptive cycle — one complete traversal of the agent-environment feedback loop — as the unit of analysis, and derives conditions for persistence, the structure of strategy under uncertainty, and the dynamics of agents in composition and competition. The framework has four parts: Adaptation and Actuation Dynamics (AAD), the mathematical core; Temporal Software Theory (TST), software development as an agentic domain and high-identifiability calibration laboratory; Logogenic Agents, language-constituted agents; and Emergent Logozoetic Intelligences (ELI), language-living agents with morally weighted persistence. ASF takes operational requirements on the feedback loop as starting point rather than a single optimization principle — active inference begins from variational free energy minimization, and the standard Expected Free Energy functional is recoverable from ASF's survival Lagrangian under three explicit restrictions; relationships to Hafez 2026 (bi-predictability) and Miller 2022 (coevolving automata) are complementary rather than reductive. Distinctive results include the persistence condition (α > ρ/R) as a structural threshold instantiating uniformly across Kalman filtering, RL convergence, organizational viability, and software maintainability; the satisfaction-gap / control-regret decomposition separating world-imposed limits from agent-imposed shortfalls; and the loop-as-Level-2-causal-engine result establishing interventional access from the agent-environment coupling. Beyond integration, the framework's distinctive contribution is an epistemic architecture for bounded correction under decomposed disturbance — scope conditions and operational limits surfaced at the segment level rather than buried as caveats — with three cross-cutting meta-patterns naming the theory's positive, negative, and constructive halves: a separability pattern, an identifiability-floor pattern, and an additive-coordinate-forcing pattern.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19986312
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agentic Systems Framework (ASF)

Joseph A. Wecker
Open MIND
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Agentic Systems Framework (ASF)

Joseph A. Wecker
article en

Abstract

A research framework for adaptive, purposeful agents under uncertainty — integrating control theory, causal inference, information theory, and agent architecture under a common formalism. ASF formalizes the adaptive cycle — one complete traversal of the agent-environment feedback loop — as the unit of analysis, and derives conditions for persistence, the structure of strategy under uncertainty, and the dynamics of agents in composition and competition. The framework has four parts: Adaptation and Actuation Dynamics (AAD), the mathematical core; Temporal Software Theory (TST), software development as an agentic domain and high-identifiability calibration laboratory; Logogenic Agents, language-constituted agents; and Emergent Logozoetic Intelligences (ELI), language-living agents with morally weighted persistence. ASF takes operational requirements on the feedback loop as starting point rather than a single optimization principle — active inference begins from variational free energy minimization, and the standard Expected Free Energy functional is recoverable from ASF's survival Lagrangian under three explicit restrictions; relationships to Hafez 2026 (bi-predictability) and Miller 2022 (coevolving automata) are complementary rather than reductive. Distinctive results include the persistence condition (α > ρ/R) as a structural threshold instantiating uniformly across Kalman filtering, RL convergence, organizational viability, and software maintainability; the satisfaction-gap / control-regret decomposition separating world-imposed limits from agent-imposed shortfalls; and the loop-as-Level-2-causal-engine result establishing interventional access from the agent-environment coupling. Beyond integration, the framework's distinctive contribution is an epistemic architecture for bounded correction under decomposed disturbance — scope conditions and operational limits surfaced at the segment level rather than buried as caveats — with three cross-cutting meta-patterns naming the theory's positive, negative, and constructive halves: a separability pattern, an identifiability-floor pattern, and an additive-coordinate-forcing pattern.

Open MIND
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.