Scientific education in German medical schools: nationwide cross-sectional study reveals student needs and gaps

INTRODUCTION: Medical graduates must integrate new scientific findings into clinical practice requiring strong scientific training. In Germany, scientific education in medical curricula is often undervalued, necessitating curricular changes. This study evaluates medical students' current scientific training, perceived and objective knowledge, and their preferences for curricular organisation. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey distributed to medical students across 45 German medical schools. The survey, conducted from March to May 2023, covered scientific education aspects including self-assessment of scientific skills and an optional 25-item knowledge competency test. Data were collected from 3005 students, with 1319 completing the full competency test. RESULTS: Only 53.8% of students were aware of their scientific curriculum, and over 60% reported no evaluation of their scientific skills at their universities. In their final year, 52.7% felt competent in literature search, and 44.1% in scientific writing. However, only 19.9% felt competent in study design, 25.7% in developing research projects, and 19.8% in applying findings to patient care. The average competency test score for final-year students was 16 out of 25, with notable deficiencies in empirics and practical applications. At least 62.2% of students expressed a desire for more scientific training, and 71.3% favoured mandatory scientific courses. CONCLUSION: German medical students are dissatisfied with their current scientific education with 75% expressing dissatisfaction. They feel unprepared to apply scientific knowledge in clinical settings. The study highlights the need for urgent curricular reforms to enhance practical scientific training and better prepare future physicians for modern medical practice and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09311-7
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific education in German medical schools: nationwide cross-sectional study reveals student needs and gaps

Ingmar Glauche, Maximilian Vogt, Lydia Günther, Jean‐Paul Bereuter et al.
BMC Medical Education
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Scientific education in German medical schools: nationwide cross-sectional study reveals student needs and gaps

Ingmar Glauche, Maximilian Vogt, Lydia Günther, Jean‐Paul Bereuter, Ingo Roeder, Sebastian Gerdes, Nadja Schuchardt, Mark Enrik Geissler, Andreas Deußen, Rona Berit Geissler
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical graduates must integrate new scientific findings into clinical practice requiring strong scientific training. In Germany, scientific education in medical curricula is often undervalued, necessitating curricular changes. This study evaluates medical students' current scientific training, perceived and objective knowledge, and their preferences for curricular organisation. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey distributed to medical students across 45 German medical schools. The survey, conducted from March to May 2023, covered scientific education aspects including self-assessment of scientific skills and an optional 25-item knowledge competency test. Data were collected from 3005 students, with 1319 completing the full competency test. RESULTS: Only 53.8% of students were aware of their scientific curriculum, and over 60% reported no evaluation of their scientific skills at their universities. In their final year, 52.7% felt competent in literature search, and 44.1% in scientific writing. However, only 19.9% felt competent in study design, 25.7% in developing research projects, and 19.8% in applying findings to patient care. The average competency test score for final-year students was 16 out of 25, with notable deficiencies in empirics and practical applications. At least 62.2% of students expressed a desire for more scientific training, and 71.3% favoured mandatory scientific courses. CONCLUSION: German medical students are dissatisfied with their current scientific education with 75% expressing dissatisfaction. They feel unprepared to apply scientific knowledge in clinical settings. The study highlights the need for urgent curricular reforms to enhance practical scientific training and better prepare future physicians for modern medical practice and research.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Technische Universität Dresden
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.