The impact of patient positioning during spinal anesthesia induction on the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache and hemodynamic stability: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication of spinal anesthesia and can significantly affect postoperative recovery. Patient positioning during spinal anesthesia has been suggested as a potential influencing factor, although evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to compare the incidence of PDPH and perioperative hemodynamic changes between sitting and lateral decubitus positions. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted from January to April 2024 at a tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 84 adult, ASA I/II patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients were allocated into either sitting or lateral decubitus position based on routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was incidence and severity of PDPH assessed over five postoperative days using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including age, sex, needle gauge, and number of puncture attempts. A p value less than 0.05 was declared as a statistically significant. RESULTS: The incidence of PDPH was significantly higher in the sitting group compared with the lateral group (23.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.04). Severity of headache was also greater in the sitting group, with all severe cases occurring in this cohort. After adjustment, sitting position remained associated with increased odds of PDPH (adjusted OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.05-14.10). Mean arterial pressure decreased in both groups after spinal anesthesia, with more pronounced early hypotension observed in the lateral group at 10 and 15 min (p < 0.01). Heart rate changes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Patient positioning during spinal anesthesia was associated with differences in PDPH incidence and early hemodynamic changes. The sitting position showed a higher association with PDPH compared with the lateral position. However, given the observational design, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03882-0
Primary Topic
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of patient positioning during spinal anesthesia induction on the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache and hemodynamic stability: a prospective cohort study

Geresu Gebeyehu, Adugna Aregawi, Mulatu Milkiyas
BMC Anesthesiology
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
article

The impact of patient positioning during spinal anesthesia induction on the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache and hemodynamic stability: a prospective cohort study

Geresu Gebeyehu, Adugna Aregawi, Mulatu Milkiyas
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-dural puncture headache is a common complication of spinal anesthesia and can significantly affect postoperative recovery. Patient positioning during spinal anesthesia has been suggested as a potential influencing factor, although evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to compare the incidence of PDPH and perioperative hemodynamic changes between sitting and lateral decubitus positions. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted from January to April 2024 at a tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 84 adult, ASA I/II patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients were allocated into either sitting or lateral decubitus position based on routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was incidence and severity of PDPH assessed over five postoperative days using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including age, sex, needle gauge, and number of puncture attempts. A p value less than 0.05 was declared as a statistically significant. RESULTS: The incidence of PDPH was significantly higher in the sitting group compared with the lateral group (23.8% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.04). Severity of headache was also greater in the sitting group, with all severe cases occurring in this cohort. After adjustment, sitting position remained associated with increased odds of PDPH (adjusted OR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.05-14.10). Mean arterial pressure decreased in both groups after spinal anesthesia, with more pronounced early hypotension observed in the lateral group at 10 and 15 min (p < 0.01). Heart rate changes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Patient positioning during spinal anesthesia was associated with differences in PDPH incidence and early hemodynamic changes. The sitting position showed a higher association with PDPH compared with the lateral position. However, given the observational design, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these results.

BMC Anesthesiology
Arba Minch University (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET)
Addis Ababa University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.