Agamben and Hobbes: Paradigm as Optical Device

Based on the hypothesis that Agamben's study of Hobbes remains underdeveloped, this research investigates the potential of Agamben's interpretation of Hobbesian thought. Chapter one will first investigate the current state of literature on this theme. We will then thoroughly analyze the second part of Stasis, zooming in on the discourse regarding the optical device that Agamben introduces to interpret Hobbes. This initial investigation of Stasis allows us to identify the intertwined aspects between that work and The Open. Consequently, in chapter two, we will investigate The Open on the basis of secular eschatology, the head, and optical devices. Finally, we conclude by illuminating how Agamben's reading of Hobbes possesses a uniqueness that cannot be reduced to his Schmittian interpretation. In conclusion, this research demonstrates the necessity of further examining the concept of the 'paradigm' within this framework, thereby uncovering the latent potential of Agamben's reading of Hobbes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17983/300588
Primary Topic
Political Theology and Sovereignty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agamben and Hobbes: Paradigm as Optical Device

BYEONGJAII WOO
THE ANNUAL REPORT ON PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
Political Theology and Sovereignty
article

Agamben and Hobbes: Paradigm as Optical Device

BYEONGJAII WOO
article en

Abstract

Based on the hypothesis that Agamben's study of Hobbes remains underdeveloped, this research investigates the potential of Agamben's interpretation of Hobbesian thought. Chapter one will first investigate the current state of literature on this theme. We will then thoroughly analyze the second part of Stasis, zooming in on the discourse regarding the optical device that Agamben introduces to interpret Hobbes. This initial investigation of Stasis allows us to identify the intertwined aspects between that work and The Open. Consequently, in chapter two, we will investigate The Open on the basis of secular eschatology, the head, and optical devices. Finally, we conclude by illuminating how Agamben's reading of Hobbes possesses a uniqueness that cannot be reduced to his Schmittian interpretation. In conclusion, this research demonstrates the necessity of further examining the concept of the 'paradigm' within this framework, thereby uncovering the latent potential of Agamben's reading of Hobbes.

THE ANNUAL REPORT ON PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGIONVol. 22
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political Theology and Sovereignty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.