Physiotherapy with integrated virtual reality for patients with severe chronic low back pain: cluster-randomized controlled trial (VARIETY)

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Physiotherapy is a common treatment, but its effect on physical functioning is generally modest, particularly for patients with severe complaints (i.e., high levels of disability and pain). Virtual Reality (VR) may complement physiotherapy, yet evidence for its effectiveness remains limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of a VR intervention integrated within physiotherapy for people with severe CLBP. METHODS: A cluster-RCT across Dutch physiotherapy practices was conducted. Patients in the control group received 12 weeks of usual care following physiotherapy guidelines. Patients in the intervention group received similar usual care, enhanced with integrated, home-based VR consisting of pain education, exercise therapy, and relaxation modules. The primary outcome was physical functioning at three months. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, pain intensity, and catastrophizing. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed-effect models accounting for clustering by physiotherapy practice. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients participated in the intervention group and seven in the VARIETY control group, instead of the planned sample size of 120 participants. Due to poor recruitment (n = 7), we supplemented the VARIETY control group with 18 historical controls from two comparable trials (total control n = 25), effectiveness analyses are therefore exploratory. Between-group differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant for all outcome measures, compared to the VARIETY control group (e.g., ODI mean difference at three months: -4.80, 95%CI: -17.78;8.18), or the total control group (-8.80, 95%CI: -20.17;2.57). The intervention group showed greater improvements from baseline in physical functioning (42%), compared to the VARIETY control group (26%). The intervention was considered feasible and safe to use in practice. DISCUSSION: This study found limited support for the use of VR as an adjunct to physiotherapy for people with severe CLBP. Given the use of external control data and the limited sample size, the effectiveness results should be interpreted cautiously. Further well-powered trials should reconsider study procedures to optimize patient recruitment and corroborate VR's clinical effectiveness in physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 2022-12-02 (reference number: NCT05701891).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09873-z
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiotherapy with integrated virtual reality for patients with severe chronic low back pain: cluster-randomized controlled trial (VARIETY)

Marjan de Vries, Wim van Lankveld, Esther Maas, Monique Tabak et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Physiotherapy with integrated virtual reality for patients with severe chronic low back pain: cluster-randomized controlled trial (VARIETY)

Marjan de Vries, Wim van Lankveld, Esther Maas, Monique Tabak, Syl Slatman, Albère Köke, Harry van Goor, Eva Poolman, J Bart Staal, Jesper Knoop, Raymond Ostelo
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Physiotherapy is a common treatment, but its effect on physical functioning is generally modest, particularly for patients with severe complaints (i.e., high levels of disability and pain). Virtual Reality (VR) may complement physiotherapy, yet evidence for its effectiveness remains limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of a VR intervention integrated within physiotherapy for people with severe CLBP. METHODS: A cluster-RCT across Dutch physiotherapy practices was conducted. Patients in the control group received 12 weeks of usual care following physiotherapy guidelines. Patients in the intervention group received similar usual care, enhanced with integrated, home-based VR consisting of pain education, exercise therapy, and relaxation modules. The primary outcome was physical functioning at three months. Secondary outcomes included feasibility, pain intensity, and catastrophizing. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed-effect models accounting for clustering by physiotherapy practice. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients participated in the intervention group and seven in the VARIETY control group, instead of the planned sample size of 120 participants. Due to poor recruitment (n = 7), we supplemented the VARIETY control group with 18 historical controls from two comparable trials (total control n = 25), effectiveness analyses are therefore exploratory. Between-group differences were neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant for all outcome measures, compared to the VARIETY control group (e.g., ODI mean difference at three months: -4.80, 95%CI: -17.78;8.18), or the total control group (-8.80, 95%CI: -20.17;2.57). The intervention group showed greater improvements from baseline in physical functioning (42%), compared to the VARIETY control group (26%). The intervention was considered feasible and safe to use in practice. DISCUSSION: This study found limited support for the use of VR as an adjunct to physiotherapy for people with severe CLBP. Given the use of external control data and the limited sample size, the effectiveness results should be interpreted cautiously. Further well-powered trials should reconsider study procedures to optimize patient recruitment and corroborate VR's clinical effectiveness in physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 2022-12-02 (reference number: NCT05701891).

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Adelante (NL), Ziekenhuis Groep Twente (NL), Department of Health (ZA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Twente (NL)
ZonMw, Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.