Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

Objective: To evaluate perceptions and challenges regarding the National Medical Commission-mandated Mentor-Mentee Programme among undergraduate medical students and faculty in Prayagraj, India. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional mixed methods study was done between August 2025 and January 2026 at the United Institute of Medical Sciences. Employing universal sampling, pre-validated semi-structured questionnaires were filled by 411 MBBS mentees and 103 faculty mentors. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whilst qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Results: Despite 89.5% of mentees confirming mentor assignment, 71.8% reported no meetings in the preceding six months. Overall satisfaction was low, reported by only 26.8% of mentees and 36.9% of mentors. Both cohorts strongly acknowledged the program's intrinsic conceptual value for academic guidance and emotional support. However, significant implementation barriers were identified: time constraints dominated qualitative themes (comprising 50–60% of reported problems), followed by the absence of structured schedules (agreed upon by 64.5% of mentees), and inadequate institutional support. Consequently, 55.7% of mentees perceived the initiative as existing solely "on paper". Mentors echoed these logistical hurdles, with 46.6% reporting infrequent or no interactions with their mentees. Conclusion: While theoretically valued, the current mentoring program functions nominally rather than practically due to systemic and logistical barriers. Optimising this initiative demands urgent institutional reforms, including mandatory, timetabled sessions, digital communication tools, and robust oversight mechanisms to support holistic student development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62425/jmefm.1912271
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

Anjani Kumar Srivastava, Arun Kumar Singh, Anuj Singh, Neha Singh Chauhan
Journal of Medical Education and Family Medicine
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Perception and challenges of the mentor-mentee programme in a medical college of Prayagraj, India: an observational, cross-sectional, mixed-method study

Anjani Kumar Srivastava, Arun Kumar Singh, Anuj Singh, Neha Singh Chauhan
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate perceptions and challenges regarding the National Medical Commission-mandated Mentor-Mentee Programme among undergraduate medical students and faculty in Prayagraj, India. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional mixed methods study was done between August 2025 and January 2026 at the United Institute of Medical Sciences. Employing universal sampling, pre-validated semi-structured questionnaires were filled by 411 MBBS mentees and 103 faculty mentors. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, whilst qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. Results: Despite 89.5% of mentees confirming mentor assignment, 71.8% reported no meetings in the preceding six months. Overall satisfaction was low, reported by only 26.8% of mentees and 36.9% of mentors. Both cohorts strongly acknowledged the program's intrinsic conceptual value for academic guidance and emotional support. However, significant implementation barriers were identified: time constraints dominated qualitative themes (comprising 50–60% of reported problems), followed by the absence of structured schedules (agreed upon by 64.5% of mentees), and inadequate institutional support. Consequently, 55.7% of mentees perceived the initiative as existing solely "on paper". Mentors echoed these logistical hurdles, with 46.6% reporting infrequent or no interactions with their mentees. Conclusion: While theoretically valued, the current mentoring program functions nominally rather than practically due to systemic and logistical barriers. Optimising this initiative demands urgent institutional reforms, including mandatory, timetabled sessions, digital communication tools, and robust oversight mechanisms to support holistic student development.

Journal of Medical Education and Family MedicineVol. 3(1)
Autonomous Healthcare (US), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.