Developing and Applying a Typology of ‘Better for You’ Claims on Alcohol Products

INTRODUCTION: To appeal to health-conscious consumers, alcohol producers are marketing products with a range of 'better for you' claims. This study aims to: (i) develop a typology of text-based 'better for you' claims used on alcohol products; (ii) assess the prevalence of these claims in the Australian market overall and by alcohol category; and (iii) identify the extent to which products display multiple claims. METHODS: Between March and November 2024, images of 5982 unique alcohol products were captured in-store from three retailers in Australia. The products were coded for presence and type of 'better for you' claims, with each claim classified into an emergent typology of categories. Descriptive analyses were conducted overall and by alcohol category. RESULTS: Eight major categories of claims were identified: nutrient content, energy content, absence of ingredient, low alcohol, fruit/botanical references, natural, processing and vegan claims. Across the sample, 35% of products displayed at least one claim (range: 1-9 claims), and one in eight displayed multiple claims. Cider (91%) and premix (75%) categories contained the highest proportion of products featuring at least one claim. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The use of claims across the Australian alcohol market appears to be quite common, particularly on premix and cider products. Limited regulation of claims allows companies to portray products as 'better for you', potentially misleading consumers and taking advantage of their efforts to be health-conscious. Future work in Australia should prioritise developing policies that restrict the use of claims on alcohol products, particularly those shown to be misleading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug and Alcohol Review
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70163
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and Applying a Typology of ‘Better for You’ Claims on Alcohol Products

Bella Sträuli, Asad Yusoff, Paula O’Brien, Jacqueline Bowden et al.
Drug and Alcohol Review
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Developing and Applying a Typology of ‘Better for You’ Claims on Alcohol Products

Bella Sträuli, Asad Yusoff, Paula O’Brien, Jacqueline Bowden, Alexandra Jones, Mark Petticrew, Simone Pettigrew
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To appeal to health-conscious consumers, alcohol producers are marketing products with a range of 'better for you' claims. This study aims to: (i) develop a typology of text-based 'better for you' claims used on alcohol products; (ii) assess the prevalence of these claims in the Australian market overall and by alcohol category; and (iii) identify the extent to which products display multiple claims. METHODS: Between March and November 2024, images of 5982 unique alcohol products were captured in-store from three retailers in Australia. The products were coded for presence and type of 'better for you' claims, with each claim classified into an emergent typology of categories. Descriptive analyses were conducted overall and by alcohol category. RESULTS: Eight major categories of claims were identified: nutrient content, energy content, absence of ingredient, low alcohol, fruit/botanical references, natural, processing and vegan claims. Across the sample, 35% of products displayed at least one claim (range: 1-9 claims), and one in eight displayed multiple claims. Cider (91%) and premix (75%) categories contained the highest proportion of products featuring at least one claim. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The use of claims across the Australian alcohol market appears to be quite common, particularly on premix and cider products. Limited regulation of claims allows companies to portray products as 'better for you', potentially misleading consumers and taking advantage of their efforts to be health-conscious. Future work in Australia should prioritise developing policies that restrict the use of claims on alcohol products, particularly those shown to be misleading.

Drug and Alcohol ReviewVol. 45(4)
Griffith University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Faculty of Public Health (GB)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.