Can machine learning predict non-suicidal self-injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is common among adolescents and young adults and remains difficult to detect early using conventional approaches. machine learning (ML) has increasingly been applied to develop prediction models for NSSI. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that developed ML models for NSSI prediction, as defined by the original study authors. Multiple databases were searched from inception to June 28, 2025. Model performance, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, was synthesized using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST+AI. Results Twelve studies involving 33,366 participants were included. In the primary model-level analysis, ensemble models showed relatively favorable pooled discrimination, with a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.85), and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58–0.84). Single models showed lower performance (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64–0.72). Only one study evaluated a deep learning (DL) model (AUC = 0.70), and this estimate should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Across all 19 models, the pooled AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71–0.79). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, and the apparent advantage of ensemble models was not sustained in the study-level sensitivity analysis. Most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in the analysis domain. Conclusions ML models show promise for identifying NSSI-related risk, but current evidence supporting true prospective prediction remains limited. The evidence base is constrained by substantial heterogeneity, a high risk of bias, and the predominance of cross-sectional studies. Prospective multicenter studies with external validation and standardized reporting are needed before ML-based models can be translated into clinical or public health practice. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251075613 , identifier: CRD420251075613.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1763121
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can machine learning predict non-suicidal self-injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rong Luo, Qianhui Wen
Frontiers in Public Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Can machine learning predict non-suicidal self-injury? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rong Luo, Qianhui Wen
article en

Abstract

Background Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is common among adolescents and young adults and remains difficult to detect early using conventional approaches. machine learning (ML) has increasingly been applied to develop prediction models for NSSI. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that developed ML models for NSSI prediction, as defined by the original study authors. Multiple databases were searched from inception to June 28, 2025. Model performance, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, was synthesized using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST+AI. Results Twelve studies involving 33,366 participants were included. In the primary model-level analysis, ensemble models showed relatively favorable pooled discrimination, with a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.85), and specificity of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58–0.84). Single models showed lower performance (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64–0.72). Only one study evaluated a deep learning (DL) model (AUC = 0.70), and this estimate should therefore be interpreted cautiously. Across all 19 models, the pooled AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71–0.79). Substantial heterogeneity was observed, and the apparent advantage of ensemble models was not sustained in the study-level sensitivity analysis. Most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in the analysis domain. Conclusions ML models show promise for identifying NSSI-related risk, but current evidence supporting true prospective prediction remains limited. The evidence base is constrained by substantial heterogeneity, a high risk of bias, and the predominance of cross-sectional studies. Prospective multicenter studies with external validation and standardized reporting are needed before ML-based models can be translated into clinical or public health practice. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251075613 , identifier: CRD420251075613.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.