Consistent Positive Associations Between Landscape Diversity and Crop Yields

Decades of evidence suggests that the relationship between landscape diversity and ecosystem productivity is positive, nonlinear, and saturating-with remarkable consistency across organisms and conditions. Despite this consensus, evidence of the impact of landscape diversity on agricultural productivity remains mixed. We use mixture modeling to systematically examine consistency in the relationship between landscape diversity and crop yields in the United States across heterogeneous model specifications for different major crops and approaches to operationalizing landscape diversity. While the diversity-productivity relationship varies across crops and landscape diversity metrics, we find a consistent (87%) positive association between landscape diversity and yields. Although not significant at a 95% credibility level, across all conditions examined highly diverse landscapes are associated with yields that are, on average, 2.7% higher than yields in highly simplified landscapes. Moreover, this relationship is not saturating, suggesting that the upper limits of positive landscape diversity effects have not been reached within contemporary U.S. cropping systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70894
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consistent Positive Associations Between Landscape Diversity and Crop Yields

Katherine S. Nelson, Emily Burchfield, Brennan Bean
Global Change Biology
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Consistent Positive Associations Between Landscape Diversity and Crop Yields

Katherine S. Nelson, Emily Burchfield, Brennan Bean
article en

Abstract

Decades of evidence suggests that the relationship between landscape diversity and ecosystem productivity is positive, nonlinear, and saturating-with remarkable consistency across organisms and conditions. Despite this consensus, evidence of the impact of landscape diversity on agricultural productivity remains mixed. We use mixture modeling to systematically examine consistency in the relationship between landscape diversity and crop yields in the United States across heterogeneous model specifications for different major crops and approaches to operationalizing landscape diversity. While the diversity-productivity relationship varies across crops and landscape diversity metrics, we find a consistent (87%) positive association between landscape diversity and yields. Although not significant at a 95% credibility level, across all conditions examined highly diverse landscapes are associated with yields that are, on average, 2.7% higher than yields in highly simplified landscapes. Moreover, this relationship is not saturating, suggesting that the upper limits of positive landscape diversity effects have not been reached within contemporary U.S. cropping systems.

Global Change BiologyVol. 32(5)
Utah State University (US), Emory University (US), Kansas State University (US), University of Missouri (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consistent Positive Associations Between Landscape Diversity and Crop Yields — Katherine S. Nelson, Emily Burchfield, et al. · Global Change Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS