When brand prominence mutes uniqueness: Deconstructing the prominence paradox with network science and machine learning

This study investigates the "Prominence Paradox": how market prominence paradoxically suppresses brand uniqueness signals. Grounded in dual-process theory, we posit a "shift in the locus of judgment" as the core mechanism. Using a large-scale survey (N = 38,986), we employ computational network analysis to derive prominence and use a dual-analysis strategy (LMM and XGBoost with SHAP) to test the framework. Findings reveal a stark asymmetry: prominence significantly attenuates the positive impact of differentiation (an identity signal), while the impact of perceived value (a transactional signal) remains robust. Quality and trust are also suppressed. This is the first study to deconstruct this paradox, contributing a novel "shift in judgment" process model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106973
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When brand prominence mutes uniqueness: Deconstructing the prominence paradox with network science and machine learning

Okkyung Jung, Jungwon Lee, Kidong Lee
Acta Psychologica
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

When brand prominence mutes uniqueness: Deconstructing the prominence paradox with network science and machine learning

Okkyung Jung, Jungwon Lee, Kidong Lee
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the "Prominence Paradox": how market prominence paradoxically suppresses brand uniqueness signals. Grounded in dual-process theory, we posit a "shift in the locus of judgment" as the core mechanism. Using a large-scale survey (N = 38,986), we employ computational network analysis to derive prominence and use a dual-analysis strategy (LMM and XGBoost with SHAP) to test the framework. Findings reveal a stark asymmetry: prominence significantly attenuates the positive impact of differentiation (an identity signal), while the impact of perceived value (a transactional signal) remains robust. Quality and trust are also suppressed. This is the first study to deconstruct this paradox, contributing a novel "shift in judgment" process model.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 266
Hoseo University (KR), Dongyang University (KR), Korean Marketing Association (KR)
Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.