Impact of Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Endoscopy on Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer in a Large‐Scale Health Screening Facility

OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted endoscopy has been developed for the early detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer; however, its clinical effectiveness remains insufficiently evaluated. This study assessed its effectiveness in a health screening facility. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Omiya City Clinic, Japan (April 2021-March 2024). Participants who underwent endoscopy between April 2021 and March 2023 were classified as the non-AI group, while those examined between April 2023 and March 2024 comprised the AI group. The AI-assisted system was introduced in April 2023. The primary outcome was cancer detection rate (CDR), with secondary outcomes including biopsy rate and positive predictive value (PPV). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection history, endoscopist experience, and prior-year endoscopy to minimize bias. RESULTS: In total, 17,662 were included in the AI group and 32,318 in the non-AI group. PSM created 17,662 matched pairs. In the AI group, the CDR for gastric cancer (GC) was significantly higher compared to the non-AI group (0.10% vs. 0.03%, p < 0.05). The biopsy rate was slightly higher in the AI group, with no significant difference, whereas the PPV of biopsy for gastric cancer and esophageal cancer was significantly increased (4.84% vs. 2.16%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical screening setting, AI-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the CDR of GC and enhanced the PPV of biopsies. These findings highlight AI-assisted endoscopy as a valuable tool for early GC diagnosis in screening environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Endoscopy
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/den.70159
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Endoscopy on Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer in a Large‐Scale Health Screening Facility

Ryo Nakagawa, Tomoaki Matsumura, Takashi Taida, Akane Kurosugi et al.
Digestive Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Impact of Artificial Intelligence‐Assisted Endoscopy on Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer in a Large‐Scale Health Screening Facility

Ryo Nakagawa, Tomoaki Matsumura, Takashi Taida, Akane Kurosugi, Chihiro Goto, Ryosuke Horio, Jun Kato, Kenichiro Okimoto, Yuki Ohta, Tsubasa Ishikawa, Tatsuya Kaneko
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted endoscopy has been developed for the early detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer; however, its clinical effectiveness remains insufficiently evaluated. This study assessed its effectiveness in a health screening facility. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Omiya City Clinic, Japan (April 2021-March 2024). Participants who underwent endoscopy between April 2021 and March 2023 were classified as the non-AI group, while those examined between April 2023 and March 2024 comprised the AI group. The AI-assisted system was introduced in April 2023. The primary outcome was cancer detection rate (CDR), with secondary outcomes including biopsy rate and positive predictive value (PPV). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection history, endoscopist experience, and prior-year endoscopy to minimize bias. RESULTS: In total, 17,662 were included in the AI group and 32,318 in the non-AI group. PSM created 17,662 matched pairs. In the AI group, the CDR for gastric cancer (GC) was significantly higher compared to the non-AI group (0.10% vs. 0.03%, p < 0.05). The biopsy rate was slightly higher in the AI group, with no significant difference, whereas the PPV of biopsy for gastric cancer and esophageal cancer was significantly increased (4.84% vs. 2.16%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical screening setting, AI-assisted endoscopy significantly improved the CDR of GC and enhanced the PPV of biopsies. These findings highlight AI-assisted endoscopy as a valuable tool for early GC diagnosis in screening environments.

Digestive EndoscopyVol. 38(5)
Chiba University (JP), Chiba University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.