Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Weight-related bias, stigma, and discrimination significantly affect quality of life and health in persons with obesity. Their influence on post-operative outcomes following metabolic surgery and bariatric remains underexplored. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate any impact of pre- and post-operative weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes, specifically physical health and mental health, including quality of life. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO. Comprehensive searches were performed across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, CINAHL, ISRCTN, and CENTRA. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies, and qualitative research involving patients who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools tailored to study design. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, examining the influence of weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-surgical outcomes. Physical health outcomes included weight loss and BMI. Mental health outcomes included depressive symptoms, disordered eating behaviours, and quality of life domains such as social interactions, occupational settings, sexual health, educational experiences, and post-surgical health management. Findings suggest that weight bias negatively influences mental health and quality of life, associating with depressive symptoms, problematic eating, and lower adherence to nutritional instructions and exercise, potentially impeding optimal physical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some studies suggesting its negative impact on postoperative outcomes, current evidence on the impact of weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes is limited. Critical gaps remain in understanding how these psychosocial factors affect long-term disease management, self-care, and overall quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Surgery
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08696-0
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

Francesco Maria Carrano, Violeta Moizé, Chiara Gerardi, Ximena Ramos Salas et al.
Obesity Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review

Francesco Maria Carrano, Violeta Moizé, Chiara Gerardi, Ximena Ramos Salas, Ken Clare, Lucia Alonso Diez, Eugenia Romano, Silvia Frusone, Ida Camperchioli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight-related bias, stigma, and discrimination significantly affect quality of life and health in persons with obesity. Their influence on post-operative outcomes following metabolic surgery and bariatric remains underexplored. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate any impact of pre- and post-operative weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes, specifically physical health and mental health, including quality of life. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO. Comprehensive searches were performed across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, PEDro, CINAHL, ISRCTN, and CENTRA. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies, and qualitative research involving patients who underwent metabolic and bariatric surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using validated tools tailored to study design. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, examining the influence of weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-surgical outcomes. Physical health outcomes included weight loss and BMI. Mental health outcomes included depressive symptoms, disordered eating behaviours, and quality of life domains such as social interactions, occupational settings, sexual health, educational experiences, and post-surgical health management. Findings suggest that weight bias negatively influences mental health and quality of life, associating with depressive symptoms, problematic eating, and lower adherence to nutritional instructions and exercise, potentially impeding optimal physical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some studies suggesting its negative impact on postoperative outcomes, current evidence on the impact of weight bias, stigma, and discrimination on post-metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes is limited. Critical gaps remain in understanding how these psychosocial factors affect long-term disease management, self-care, and overall quality of life.

Obesity Surgery
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), King's College School (GB), The Princess Grace Hospital (GB), European Association for the Study of Obesity (GB), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.