Structural Symmetry Modeling and Network Optimization for Evaluating Industrial Chain Integration and Firm Performance: Evidence from Xinjiang’s Characteristic Food Processing Industry Under the Big Food Concept

Industrial chains in agriculture are currently fragmented and do not support developing resource-based competitive advantages. This is true under the Big Food Framework’s strategic orientation. This research seeks to develop a new analytical framework for evaluating pathways to the integration of agricultural industrial chains and their impact on the performance of companies engaged in food processing in Xinjiang. A mixed-method approach, employing both an exploratory and sequential design, will be used to do this. The primary method of data collection for this study is the case study method, along with the questionnaire method involving 145 agricultural enterprises. From these data, structural equation modeling (SEM) will be used to test the paths of causation among cognitive managers of firms who have implemented the BFF. Evidence will be presented to demonstrate the relationship among three types of integration (vertical, horizontal, and lateral) in the agricultural industrial chain, dynamic capabilities, and company performance. Additionally, network topology and optimization simulations will be conducted to determine how effectively structures are organized in training the respective companies. Important findings revealed in this research include the following: The managerial cognition constructs offered by BFFs play a key role in enhancing the depth and structural balance of industry chain integration. There were complementary performance effects found, and they are related to vertical integration achieving operational efficiency and financial efficiency; horizontal integration improving market competitiveness and brand competitiveness; and lateral integration facilitating innovative growth. Dynamic capabilities are a significant mediating mechanism linking institutional support and digital capability with the depth of integration across different modes of integration. The findings from network optimization suggest that there is a positive effect of balanced connectivity across the different dimensions of integration on overall system efficiency and reduced structural inefficiencies. Based on these findings, the authors recommend that organizations establish governance mechanisms that facilitate coordinated connectivity; strengthen adaptive capabilities within the firm; and promote balanced integration across industrial networks. Future researchers should consider applying these findings to conducting longitudinal studies on network evolution; integrating sustainability measures as part of their analysis; and conducting comparative validation studies across regions or industry systems.