Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices

Background/objectives Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common genetic disorder often accompanied by cognitive, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders. While tumor-related manifestations are well-documented, less attention has been paid to standardized assessment of neuropsychological profiles in affected children. This systematic review aimed to evaluate current assessment practices for cognitive, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental domains in pediatric NF1. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases (April 2015–April 2025) using predefined keywords and Boolean logic. Eligibility criteria included original studies assessing neurodevelopmental, cognitive, motor, behavioral, or social–emotional outcomes in pediatric NF1 populations (0–18 years). Exclusion criteria comprised adult-only samples, reviews, non-English publications, and animal models. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Results From 414 identified records, 84 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 35 domains were explored, with cognitive functioning ( n = 41), executive functioning ( n = 33), behavior ( n = 28), and attention ( n = 22) most frequently assessed. Over 110 assessment tools were used, including the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, BRIEF, CBCL, and Conners Rating Scales. However, 52.4% of studies focused on children aged 6 years or older, indicating that preschool-aged children remain underrepresented in the literature and limiting opportunities for early identification. Few studies employed validated diagnostic instruments for ASD or ADHD (e.g., ADOS-2, ADI-R, and K-SADS), while most relied on symptom rating scales such as the CBCL or Conners questionnaires, which assess behavioral traits but do not establish a clinical diagnosis. Conclusion Current assessment practices in pediatric NF1 are heterogeneous and often neglect early developmental windows. The integration of standardized, age-appropriate tools and early neurodevelopmental screening—supported by interdisciplinary teams including neuropsychomotor therapists—may improve detection and management of NF1-related neurocognitive phenotypes. A shared framework for assessment is essential to enhance clinical care and research comparability. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251119558 , identifier CRD420251119558.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1794510
Primary Topic
Soft tissue tumor case studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices

Luca Bergonzini, Maria Stella Vari, S. De Pasquale, I Cecconi et al.
Frontiers in Neurology
Soft tissue tumor case studies
article

Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices

Luca Bergonzini, Maria Stella Vari, S. De Pasquale, I Cecconi, Ilaria Luongo, Andrea Santangelo, Federica Mela, Alessandra Sardi
article en

Abstract

Background/objectives Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common genetic disorder often accompanied by cognitive, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders. While tumor-related manifestations are well-documented, less attention has been paid to standardized assessment of neuropsychological profiles in affected children. This systematic review aimed to evaluate current assessment practices for cognitive, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental domains in pediatric NF1. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase databases (April 2015–April 2025) using predefined keywords and Boolean logic. Eligibility criteria included original studies assessing neurodevelopmental, cognitive, motor, behavioral, or social–emotional outcomes in pediatric NF1 populations (0–18 years). Exclusion criteria comprised adult-only samples, reviews, non-English publications, and animal models. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines. Results From 414 identified records, 84 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 35 domains were explored, with cognitive functioning ( n = 41), executive functioning ( n = 33), behavior ( n = 28), and attention ( n = 22) most frequently assessed. Over 110 assessment tools were used, including the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, BRIEF, CBCL, and Conners Rating Scales. However, 52.4% of studies focused on children aged 6 years or older, indicating that preschool-aged children remain underrepresented in the literature and limiting opportunities for early identification. Few studies employed validated diagnostic instruments for ASD or ADHD (e.g., ADOS-2, ADI-R, and K-SADS), while most relied on symptom rating scales such as the CBCL or Conners questionnaires, which assess behavioral traits but do not establish a clinical diagnosis. Conclusion Current assessment practices in pediatric NF1 are heterogeneous and often neglect early developmental windows. The integration of standardized, age-appropriate tools and early neurodevelopmental screening—supported by interdisciplinary teams including neuropsychomotor therapists—may improve detection and management of NF1-related neurocognitive phenotypes. A shared framework for assessment is essential to enhance clinical care and research comparability. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251119558 , identifier CRD420251119558.

Frontiers in NeurologyVol. 17
Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), University of Genoa (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soft tissue tumor case studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.