Building an ontology of resilience: Insights from the physical resilience literature

Physical resilience is a term used to describe an individual's response to physical and physiological stressors across the fields of gerontology and rehabilitation sciences. However, the term has not yet undergone a rigorous examination of its underlying assumptions, which has hindered its theoretical development and empirical measurement. This paper reviews the existing definitions of physical resilience in the context of human physical and psychological systems to examine its underlying, implicit assumptions. The aim is to clarify the conceptual foundations of physical resilience, identify its necessary components, and propose a formal ontological framework based on them. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature using databases including PubMed and Web of Science. Definitions were extracted from experimental and conceptual papers and analyzed for shared themes and implicit assumptions. These ranged from general notions of recovery or adaptation to specific models of post-perturbation performance trajectories. Across studies, outcomes included whole-body, physiological, and occasional psychological or cognitive measures. However, the term physical was rarely explicitly defined, making it unclear how it modifies the term resilience. Only two studies referenced formal models of resilience, and few distinguished resilience from related constructs like adaptation or robustness. Findings revealed a lack of conceptual coherence in the current literature. We propose that physical resilience may be understood as an emergent, time-dependent disposition at the whole-body level involving interactions across multiple biological systems and scales. We suggest that a formal ontological framework of resilience can help clarify perturbation, recovery, and domain-specific contributions to support consistent measurement and interdisciplinary integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ageing Research Reviews
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2026.103155
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building an ontology of resilience: Insights from the physical resilience literature

Jennifer M. Yentes, John Manning, Breanna Morales
Ageing Research Reviews
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Building an ontology of resilience: Insights from the physical resilience literature

Jennifer M. Yentes, John Manning, Breanna Morales
article en

Abstract

Physical resilience is a term used to describe an individual's response to physical and physiological stressors across the fields of gerontology and rehabilitation sciences. However, the term has not yet undergone a rigorous examination of its underlying assumptions, which has hindered its theoretical development and empirical measurement. This paper reviews the existing definitions of physical resilience in the context of human physical and psychological systems to examine its underlying, implicit assumptions. The aim is to clarify the conceptual foundations of physical resilience, identify its necessary components, and propose a formal ontological framework based on them. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature using databases including PubMed and Web of Science. Definitions were extracted from experimental and conceptual papers and analyzed for shared themes and implicit assumptions. These ranged from general notions of recovery or adaptation to specific models of post-perturbation performance trajectories. Across studies, outcomes included whole-body, physiological, and occasional psychological or cognitive measures. However, the term physical was rarely explicitly defined, making it unclear how it modifies the term resilience. Only two studies referenced formal models of resilience, and few distinguished resilience from related constructs like adaptation or robustness. Findings revealed a lack of conceptual coherence in the current literature. We propose that physical resilience may be understood as an emergent, time-dependent disposition at the whole-body level involving interactions across multiple biological systems and scales. We suggest that a formal ontological framework of resilience can help clarify perturbation, recovery, and domain-specific contributions to support consistent measurement and interdisciplinary integration.

Ageing Research ReviewsVol. 119
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.