Quality of life of children affected by rare diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to analyze, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the perceived quality of life (QoL) of children diagnosed with rare diseases and to examine potential moderating variables. Twenty-four samples (k = 24; N = 1030) were identified in 8 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed good levels of quality of life, although perceived quality of life was lower compared to the general population. Substantial heterogeneity was found across studies (I² = 86.7%). Meta-regression analyses identified significant moderating effects for geographic region, type of measurement instrument, and type of disease. No evidence of publication bias was detected (Egger’s test, p = .62). These findings highlight the need to strengthen comprehensive care, healthcare coordination and psychosocial support for affected children and their families

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4995/reinad.2026.22075
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life of children affected by rare diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Susana Gómez Redondo, Alberto Soto, Borja Romero‐Gonzalez, Victor Gonzalez-Lopez
Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Quality of life of children affected by rare diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Susana Gómez Redondo, Alberto Soto, Borja Romero‐Gonzalez, Victor Gonzalez-Lopez
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the perceived quality of life (QoL) of children diagnosed with rare diseases and to examine potential moderating variables. Twenty-four samples (k = 24; N = 1030) were identified in 8 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Results showed good levels of quality of life, although perceived quality of life was lower compared to the general population. Substantial heterogeneity was found across studies (I² = 86.7%). Meta-regression analyses identified significant moderating effects for geographic region, type of measurement instrument, and type of disease. No evidence of publication bias was detected (Egger’s test, p = .62). These findings highlight the need to strengthen comprehensive care, healthcare coordination and psychosocial support for affected children and their families

Revista sobre la infancia y la adolescencia(30)
Universidad de Valladolid
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.