Training load and intensity in triathlon: objective differences between sex, age, race distance preference and training phase across a cohort of 95 age-group triathletes over six months

Aim This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe a large dataset of objective training load (TL) data from training sessions of age-group triathletes and to compare sex, age group, race distance preferences, and training phases. Methods An online survey collected TL data from 95 age-group triathletes (18 female, 77 male) in 25 countries. The data included the distance, duration, average heart rate, and training stress score (TSS) for 34,731 training sessions. A Linear Mixed Model analysis was completed, and neither age nor sex was associated with TL ( p > 0.05), and mean heart rate (% of HRmax) was not associated with any factors. Results The TL of long-course triathletes (615 min./wk, 171 Km/wk, 574 TSS/wk) was higher than that of short-course athletes (507 min./wk, 118 Km/wk, 452 TSS/wk). There were differences ( p < 0.05) in TL between four training phases, with the ’specific’ phase having the highest TL (556 min./wk, 166 Km/wk, 620 TSS/wk) and off-season the lowest (340 min./wk, 84 Km/wk, 364 TSS/wk). Differences ( p < 0.05) in TL based on race distance and training phase align with evidence-based practice. Conclusions Comparisons of TL with the cohort values reported here may be helpful to coaches and athletes, given the previous absence of objective age-group athlete datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1798702
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training load and intensity in triathlon: objective differences between sex, age, race distance preference and training phase across a cohort of 95 age-group triathletes over six months

Leighton A. Wells, Peter Kremer, Samantha M. Hoffmann, Lyndell Bruce et al.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Sports Performance and Training
article

Training load and intensity in triathlon: objective differences between sex, age, race distance preference and training phase across a cohort of 95 age-group triathletes over six months

Leighton A. Wells, Peter Kremer, Samantha M. Hoffmann, Lyndell Bruce, Dan B. Dwyer
article en

Abstract

Aim This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe a large dataset of objective training load (TL) data from training sessions of age-group triathletes and to compare sex, age group, race distance preferences, and training phases. Methods An online survey collected TL data from 95 age-group triathletes (18 female, 77 male) in 25 countries. The data included the distance, duration, average heart rate, and training stress score (TSS) for 34,731 training sessions. A Linear Mixed Model analysis was completed, and neither age nor sex was associated with TL ( p > 0.05), and mean heart rate (% of HRmax) was not associated with any factors. Results The TL of long-course triathletes (615 min./wk, 171 Km/wk, 574 TSS/wk) was higher than that of short-course athletes (507 min./wk, 118 Km/wk, 452 TSS/wk). There were differences ( p < 0.05) in TL between four training phases, with the ’specific’ phase having the highest TL (556 min./wk, 166 Km/wk, 620 TSS/wk) and off-season the lowest (340 min./wk, 84 Km/wk, 364 TSS/wk). Differences ( p < 0.05) in TL based on race distance and training phase align with evidence-based practice. Conclusions Comparisons of TL with the cohort values reported here may be helpful to coaches and athletes, given the previous absence of objective age-group athlete datasets.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 8
Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.