Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is an important outcome to measure quality of care. The hypothesis of this study was that more severe baseline neck disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI] scores 70-100) is associated with less frequent postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: This study used the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group's cervical dataset module from the Quality Outcomes Database, which included 1085 patients. Baseline demographics, clinical variables, and surgical parameters were collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected include EQ-5D, NDI, and numeric rating scale for neck pain and arm pain scores. Heat maps were created to demonstrate the association of NDI scores with postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 1085 patients in this study with a 5-year follow-up rate of 83% for the NDI. PROs significantly improved 1 and 5 years postoperatively. Multivariate regression models found baseline NDI scores to be associated with 1- and 5-year satisfaction (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-0.99], p = 0.004). Heat maps were created to determine the significance of baseline, 1-year, and 5-year NDI scores on satisfaction rates. The level of satisfaction decreased with increasing 1- and 5-year NDI scores. Additionally, patients with higher baseline NDI scores required a more significant change in NDI to achieve satisfaction with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more severe disability measured by the NDI require a greater change in postoperative NDI scores to meet satisfaction. Despite the importance of postoperative satisfaction, failure to achieve satisfaction should not be assumed to be due to lack of clinical benefit. Discussing a patient's goals and expectations preoperatively is essential to maximize the probability of achieving satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical FOCUS
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.12.focus25944
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data

Paul K. Kim, Izza Tahir, Matthew J. McGirt, Cheerag D. Upadhyaya et al.
Neurosurgical FOCUS
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data

Paul K. Kim, Izza Tahir, Matthew J. McGirt, Cheerag D. Upadhyaya, Oren N. Gottfried, Hendrik von Kentzinsky, Luis M. Tumialán, Vincent J. Alentado, Michael S. Virk, Daniel Zeitouni, John J. Knightly, Eric A. Potts, Kai-Ming Fu, Timothy J. Yee, Regis W. Haid, Paul Park, Irina-Mihaela Matache, Mohamad Bydon, Kevin T Foley, Michael Y Wang, Christopher I Shaffrey, Chun-Po Yen, Dean Chou, Praveen V Mummaneni, Andrew K Chan, Jay D Turner, Juan S Uribe, Anthony L Asher, Erica F Bisson, Scott Meyer
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is an important outcome to measure quality of care. The hypothesis of this study was that more severe baseline neck disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI] scores 70-100) is associated with less frequent postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: This study used the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group's cervical dataset module from the Quality Outcomes Database, which included 1085 patients. Baseline demographics, clinical variables, and surgical parameters were collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected include EQ-5D, NDI, and numeric rating scale for neck pain and arm pain scores. Heat maps were created to demonstrate the association of NDI scores with postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 1085 patients in this study with a 5-year follow-up rate of 83% for the NDI. PROs significantly improved 1 and 5 years postoperatively. Multivariate regression models found baseline NDI scores to be associated with 1- and 5-year satisfaction (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-0.99], p = 0.004). Heat maps were created to determine the significance of baseline, 1-year, and 5-year NDI scores on satisfaction rates. The level of satisfaction decreased with increasing 1- and 5-year NDI scores. Additionally, patients with higher baseline NDI scores required a more significant change in NDI to achieve satisfaction with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more severe disability measured by the NDI require a greater change in postoperative NDI scores to meet satisfaction. Despite the importance of postoperative satisfaction, failure to achieve satisfaction should not be assumed to be due to lack of clinical benefit. Discussing a patient's goals and expectations preoperatively is essential to maximize the probability of achieving satisfaction.

Neurosurgical FOCUSVol. 60(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Barrow Neurological Institute (US), Carolinas Healthcare System (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates (US), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Indiana Spine Group (US), Maxim Integrated (United States) (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), University of Virginia (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.