Signal-Time-Authority Runtime Oversight: A Pre-Commitment Controllability Framework

This record is Paper 1 of the Signal-Time-Authority (STA) Series. Paper 1 defines Signal-Time-Authority (STA) as a pre-commitment controllability framework for runtime AI oversight. The central claim is that runtime oversight should be considered control-relevant only when usable signal, remaining time, effective authority, and valid intervention policy remain jointly adequate before an externally consequential commitment event. This paper is a theory and framework paper. It does not claim to prove AI safety, does not provide real-world deployment validation, and does not replace domain-specific safety standards, certification, or governance review. Companion papers in the STA Series cover synthetic toy simulation evidence, runtime authority governor architecture, physical AI safe-stop reasoning, and governance / assurance-case framing. This is a PublicRelease v1.0 record.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19980762
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Signal-Time-Authority Runtime Oversight: A Pre-Commitment Controllability Framework

Htet Ko Ko Naing
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

Signal-Time-Authority Runtime Oversight: A Pre-Commitment Controllability Framework

Htet Ko Ko Naing
article en

Abstract

This record is Paper 1 of the Signal-Time-Authority (STA) Series. Paper 1 defines Signal-Time-Authority (STA) as a pre-commitment controllability framework for runtime AI oversight. The central claim is that runtime oversight should be considered control-relevant only when usable signal, remaining time, effective authority, and valid intervention policy remain jointly adequate before an externally consequential commitment event. This paper is a theory and framework paper. It does not claim to prove AI safety, does not provide real-world deployment validation, and does not replace domain-specific safety standards, certification, or governance review. Companion papers in the STA Series cover synthetic toy simulation evidence, runtime authority governor architecture, physical AI safe-stop reasoning, and governance / assurance-case framing. This is a PublicRelease v1.0 record.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.