Ethical Limits of AI in Decision-Making: Beyond Bias – Autonomy vs Control

This research paper, “Ethical Limits of AI in Decision-Making: Beyond Bias - Autonomy vs Control,” examines the expanding role of Artificial Intelligence in critical sectors and the ethical challenges that arise as machines take on more autonomous decision making responsibilities. Moving beyond common concerns like bias and fairness, the study explores deeper issues such as accountability, transparency, and the preservation of human values, highlighting the risks of over reliance on AI, including reduced human judgment and ethical disengagement. Through real world applications in areas like healthcare, finance, and law enforcement, the paper demonstrates both the benefits and limitations of AI systems, emphasizing that while they enhance efficiency and accuracy, they cannot replace human empathy and moral reasoning. It ultimately advocates for a balanced, hybrid approach where AI supports rather than replaces human decision-making, reinforced by strong ethical frameworks and regulatory oversight to ensure responsible and trustworthy use of technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19968663
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Limits of AI in Decision-Making: Beyond Bias – Autonomy vs Control

Lakshya Sharma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethical Limits of AI in Decision-Making: Beyond Bias – Autonomy vs Control

Lakshya Sharma
article en

Abstract

This research paper, “Ethical Limits of AI in Decision-Making: Beyond Bias - Autonomy vs Control,” examines the expanding role of Artificial Intelligence in critical sectors and the ethical challenges that arise as machines take on more autonomous decision making responsibilities. Moving beyond common concerns like bias and fairness, the study explores deeper issues such as accountability, transparency, and the preservation of human values, highlighting the risks of over reliance on AI, including reduced human judgment and ethical disengagement. Through real world applications in areas like healthcare, finance, and law enforcement, the paper demonstrates both the benefits and limitations of AI systems, emphasizing that while they enhance efficiency and accuracy, they cannot replace human empathy and moral reasoning. It ultimately advocates for a balanced, hybrid approach where AI supports rather than replaces human decision-making, reinforced by strong ethical frameworks and regulatory oversight to ensure responsible and trustworthy use of technology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.