Factors influencing the preferred method of fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Aims: The aim of this study was to report the findings of a national survey of consultant hip surgeons in the UK investigating their practice and factors which influence their choice of the method of fixation when undertaking primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: An online survey was conducted in 2024 with questions about surgeons' practice, a rating exercise with open text questions, and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). In the DCE, surgeons were presented with ten randomly assigned profiles of patients described by age, sex, level of activity, risk of medical problems, and risk of fracture, and were asked to choose their preferred method of fixation (cemented, uncemented, or hybrid) for each. Results: A total of 101 consultants performing a mean 121 (SD 81) primary elective THAs annually for a mean 12.5 years (SD 8.5) completed the survey. For patients aged < 70 years, 61 (60%) would use hybrid, 31 (31%) uncemented, and nine (9%) cemented THAs. For patients aged > 70 years, 56 (55%) would use hybrid, 33 (33%) cemented, 11 (11%) uncemented, and one (1%) a reverse hybrid. In the DCE, the most influential characteristics of a patient were their age and level of activity. For a 'moderately active' male patient, the probability of surgeons choosing a cemented THA was 10% at the age of 65 years and 39% at the age of 85 years. These probabilities were 15% and 47% for a female patient. An increased perceived risk of fracture decreased the probability of choosing an uncemented THA. A total of 24 surgeons chose the same implant regardless of the patient's profile. In the rating exercise, the most influential factors besides the characteristics of the patient were the revision rate, the personal audit of the surgeon's practice, and the published evidence and guidelines. Analysis of free-text responses identified further important influencing factors such as the patient's anatomy and bone quality, and the surgeons' training, skill, and experience. Conclusion: This is the largest survey of UK consultant hip surgeons providing an understanding of the determinants of choices of the type of THA when undertaking primary THA in patients with hip osteoarthritis. These findings will inform the implementation of the findings of studies involving THA in relation to the practices of surgeons in the 'real world'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bone & Joint Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.108b5.bjj-2025-0712.r1
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing the preferred method of fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Andrew Moore, Petra Baji, Cecily Palmer, Elsa M R Marques et al.
The Bone & Joint Journal
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Factors influencing the preferred method of fixation in total hip arthroplasty

Andrew Moore, Petra Baji, Cecily Palmer, Elsa M R Marques, Jonathan T Evans, Michael R Whitehouse
article en

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to report the findings of a national survey of consultant hip surgeons in the UK investigating their practice and factors which influence their choice of the method of fixation when undertaking primary elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: An online survey was conducted in 2024 with questions about surgeons' practice, a rating exercise with open text questions, and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). In the DCE, surgeons were presented with ten randomly assigned profiles of patients described by age, sex, level of activity, risk of medical problems, and risk of fracture, and were asked to choose their preferred method of fixation (cemented, uncemented, or hybrid) for each. Results: A total of 101 consultants performing a mean 121 (SD 81) primary elective THAs annually for a mean 12.5 years (SD 8.5) completed the survey. For patients aged < 70 years, 61 (60%) would use hybrid, 31 (31%) uncemented, and nine (9%) cemented THAs. For patients aged > 70 years, 56 (55%) would use hybrid, 33 (33%) cemented, 11 (11%) uncemented, and one (1%) a reverse hybrid. In the DCE, the most influential characteristics of a patient were their age and level of activity. For a 'moderately active' male patient, the probability of surgeons choosing a cemented THA was 10% at the age of 65 years and 39% at the age of 85 years. These probabilities were 15% and 47% for a female patient. An increased perceived risk of fracture decreased the probability of choosing an uncemented THA. A total of 24 surgeons chose the same implant regardless of the patient's profile. In the rating exercise, the most influential factors besides the characteristics of the patient were the revision rate, the personal audit of the surgeon's practice, and the published evidence and guidelines. Analysis of free-text responses identified further important influencing factors such as the patient's anatomy and bone quality, and the surgeons' training, skill, and experience. Conclusion: This is the largest survey of UK consultant hip surgeons providing an understanding of the determinants of choices of the type of THA when undertaking primary THA in patients with hip osteoarthritis. These findings will inform the implementation of the findings of studies involving THA in relation to the practices of surgeons in the 'real world'.

The Bone & Joint JournalVol. 108-B(5)
University of Exeter (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.