Foundations of a Fars-centric state: Orientalist discourse and imperial agenda

The presented study examines the ideological foundations of Iranian statehood and its Persian-centered identity politics in recent centuries. After the decline of the Qajar dynasty, the Pahlavi dynasty, which came to power in 1925 with the support of imperialist forces, rewrote Iranian history and placed Persian culture at the center of state-building. As a result of the policies implemented by the Pahlavis, the language and culture of non-Persian peoples such as Turks, Arabs, Kurds, and Baluchis were marginalized. This study shows that claims about Iran’s ancient statehood traditions serve more political-ideological purposes. Consequently, modern Iranian statehood is not a product of natural historical development, but a model formed under the influence of colonial projects. This, in turn, created an ideological basis for assimilation policies that limited the rights of non-Persian peoples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19953543
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foundations of a Fars-centric state: Orientalist discourse and imperial agenda

Hasan Safari, Nazim Mansimov, Asim Jannatov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Islamic Studies and History
article

Foundations of a Fars-centric state: Orientalist discourse and imperial agenda

Hasan Safari, Nazim Mansimov, Asim Jannatov
article en

Abstract

The presented study examines the ideological foundations of Iranian statehood and its Persian-centered identity politics in recent centuries. After the decline of the Qajar dynasty, the Pahlavi dynasty, which came to power in 1925 with the support of imperialist forces, rewrote Iranian history and placed Persian culture at the center of state-building. As a result of the policies implemented by the Pahlavis, the language and culture of non-Persian peoples such as Turks, Arabs, Kurds, and Baluchis were marginalized. This study shows that claims about Iran’s ancient statehood traditions serve more political-ideological purposes. Consequently, modern Iranian statehood is not a product of natural historical development, but a model formed under the influence of colonial projects. This, in turn, created an ideological basis for assimilation policies that limited the rights of non-Persian peoples.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (AZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Foundations of a Fars-centric state: Orientalist discourse and imperial agenda — Hasan Safari, Nazim Mansimov, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS