Rethinking Resource Classification: Should Animals Be Recognized as a Separate Resource Category?

Resource classification forms a fundamental part of geographical and environmental studies. Traditionally, resources are categorized into natural, human-made, and human resources, with living organisms grouped under biotic resources. However, this classification raises a critical question regarding the position of animals. This paper examines whether animals, given their significant ecological and economic contributions, should be recognized as a separate category of resources. By analyzing global frameworks and conceptual distinctions, the study evaluates the roles of humans and animals in resource utilization. The findings suggest that while animals are essential components of natural systems, their inclusion within biotic resources remains logically consistent due to the unique cognitive and transformative abilities of humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19941470
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Resource Classification: Should Animals Be Recognized as a Separate Resource Category?

Adarsh Raj
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Rethinking Resource Classification: Should Animals Be Recognized as a Separate Resource Category?

Adarsh Raj
article en

Abstract

Resource classification forms a fundamental part of geographical and environmental studies. Traditionally, resources are categorized into natural, human-made, and human resources, with living organisms grouped under biotic resources. However, this classification raises a critical question regarding the position of animals. This paper examines whether animals, given their significant ecological and economic contributions, should be recognized as a separate category of resources. By analyzing global frameworks and conceptual distinctions, the study evaluates the roles of humans and animals in resource utilization. The findings suggest that while animals are essential components of natural systems, their inclusion within biotic resources remains logically consistent due to the unique cognitive and transformative abilities of humans.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sunbeam Foundation (US), Czech Concrete Society (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.