Quantifying the U.S. surgical instrument fleet and its reprocessing burden: implications for cost and sustainability in healthcare

BACKGROUND: Reusable surgical instruments require repeated sterilization between procedures, yet many instruments prepared for surgery are never used. The national scale of the reusable surgical instrument fleet and its associated reprocessing burden remain poorly quantified. METHODS: Aggregated operational data from 251 U.S. healthcare facilities encompassing 2,618 operating rooms were analyzed to quantify instrument inventories, sterilization volume, and instrument loss. National estimates were derived by scaling operating room-level metrics to reported U.S. operating room capacity. Published sterilization cost estimates and instrument utilization rates were applied to estimate national sterilization expenditures and idle reprocessing costs. Replacement costs for missing instruments were modeled using log normal price distributions and Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The dataset included 336,784 trays and 6.7 million instruments, with 236 million instruments reprocessed annually. National extrapolation suggests a reusable instrument fleet of approximately 112 million instruments and nearly 4 billion annual reprocessing events. Estimated annual sterilization costs ranged from $1.3 to $11.8 billion. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an initial estimate of the national cost of surgical instrument reprocessing in the U.S. Further work is required to determine a national estimate of the percentage of instruments that go unused. Nevertheless, the scale of expenditures on this process indicates there will be significant opportunities to improve perioperative efficiency and reduce waste through better inventory management yielding substantial cost savings and decreasing the environmental footprint of surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14663-3
Primary Topic
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the U.S. surgical instrument fleet and its reprocessing burden: implications for cost and sustainability in healthcare

Abner Mácola, William Estes, Peter F Nichol
BMC Health Services Research
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
article

Quantifying the U.S. surgical instrument fleet and its reprocessing burden: implications for cost and sustainability in healthcare

Abner Mácola, William Estes, Peter F Nichol
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reusable surgical instruments require repeated sterilization between procedures, yet many instruments prepared for surgery are never used. The national scale of the reusable surgical instrument fleet and its associated reprocessing burden remain poorly quantified. METHODS: Aggregated operational data from 251 U.S. healthcare facilities encompassing 2,618 operating rooms were analyzed to quantify instrument inventories, sterilization volume, and instrument loss. National estimates were derived by scaling operating room-level metrics to reported U.S. operating room capacity. Published sterilization cost estimates and instrument utilization rates were applied to estimate national sterilization expenditures and idle reprocessing costs. Replacement costs for missing instruments were modeled using log normal price distributions and Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The dataset included 336,784 trays and 6.7 million instruments, with 236 million instruments reprocessed annually. National extrapolation suggests a reusable instrument fleet of approximately 112 million instruments and nearly 4 billion annual reprocessing events. Estimated annual sterilization costs ranged from $1.3 to $11.8 billion. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an initial estimate of the national cost of surgical instrument reprocessing in the U.S. Further work is required to determine a national estimate of the percentage of instruments that go unused. Nevertheless, the scale of expenditures on this process indicates there will be significant opportunities to improve perioperative efficiency and reduce waste through better inventory management yielding substantial cost savings and decreasing the environmental footprint of surgical care.

BMC Health Services Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying the U.S. surgical instrument fleet and its reprocessing burden: implications for cost and sustainability in healthcare — Abner Mácola, William Estes, et al. · BMC Health Services Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS