Semantic Selection of Interrogatives as Syntactic Dependencies

This paper investigates patterns of finite interrogative clauses in the context of s(emantic)-selection, with the empirical focus on Korean and Japanese. While s-selection of interrogatives is satisfied non-locally in these languages, it is blocked across the DP domain in nominalized contexts. Further, the languages must opt for an interrogative variant of nominalizer to locally satisfy s-selection. In order to account for these patterns, I propose that s-selection of interrogatives involves a type of syntactic dependencies, which is subject to phase-based locality and involves the valuation of a selection feature. This claim, in a broader context, suggests that certain types of s-selection may as well be motivated as a syntactic requirement rather than a lexical constraint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BieJournals
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11576/glow-1258
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semantic Selection of Interrogatives as Syntactic Dependencies

Yeongmin Kim
BieJournals
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Semantic Selection of Interrogatives as Syntactic Dependencies

Yeongmin Kim
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates patterns of finite interrogative clauses in the context of s(emantic)-selection, with the empirical focus on Korean and Japanese. While s-selection of interrogatives is satisfied non-locally in these languages, it is blocked across the DP domain in nominalized contexts. Further, the languages must opt for an interrogative variant of nominalizer to locally satisfy s-selection. In order to account for these patterns, I propose that s-selection of interrogatives involves a type of syntactic dependencies, which is subject to phase-based locality and involves the valuation of a selection feature. This claim, in a broader context, suggests that certain types of s-selection may as well be motivated as a syntactic requirement rather than a lexical constraint.

BieJournals
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.