ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar consensus on the management of knee cartilage injuries in football players: part 2–appropriateness of specific surgical procedures to address articular cartilage lesions in different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriat

Knee articular cartilage lesions are frequent in football players, but evidence for the most suitable surgical treatments is lacking. The aim of this International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society, Fédération Internationale de Football Association and Aspetar (ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar) consensus was to develop expert-based, patient-specific practical recommendations on the appropriateness of surgical treatments for symptomatic knee articular cartilage lesions in competitive football players. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used by 17 voting experts to provide recommendations on the suitability of six different surgical procedures (debridement, debridement+orthobiologics, bone marrow stimulation procedures, osteochondral autograft transplantation, allografts, and regenerative procedures) depending on four key clinical considerations: lesion location, defect size, bone involvement, and patient preference towards higher priority for a quick return to play or long-term results. These resulted in 96 scenarios (16 clinical scenarios for six surgical procedures). Altogether, in 94% of clinical scenarios, at least one surgical procedure was considered appropriate. Patient preference had the highest influence on the results. Debridement plus orthobiologics was most often considered appropriate in patients preferring a quick return to play, while regenerative techniques were more often considered appropriate with patients prioritising long-term results. Osteochondral autograft transplantation and allografts were considered appropriate only in selected scenarios, whereas bone marrow stimulation procedures were considered inappropriate or uncertain. The recommendations established by this ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar consensus on the appropriateness of different surgical procedures to treat symptomatic articular cartilage lesions in competitive football players should be used as broad guidelines, but the preferred treatment should be player-specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-110676
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar consensus on the management of knee cartilage injuries in football players: part 2–appropriateness of specific surgical procedures to address articular cartilage lesions in different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriat

Celeste Geertsema, Kristof Sas, Bashir Zikria, Cassandra A. Lee et al.
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar consensus on the management of knee cartilage injuries in football players: part 2–appropriateness of specific surgical procedures to address articular cartilage lesions in different clinical scenarios using the RAND/UCLA appropriat

Celeste Geertsema, Kristof Sas, Bashir Zikria, Cassandra A. Lee, Andreas Serner, Camila Cohen Kaleka, Ramón Cugat, Christoph Erggelet, Luca Andriolo, Liesel Geertsema, Cristiano Eirale, Giuseppe Filardo, Willem van der Merwe, Francesco Della Villa, Andrew Massey, Bert Mandelbaum, Stefano Zaffagnini, Pieter D'Hooghe, Claudia Arias, João Espregueira-Mendes, Christian Fink, Peter Verdonk, Emmanuel Papakostas, Elizaveta Kon, Andy Williams, Peter Angele, Norimasa Nakamura, David A Parker, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
article en

Abstract

Knee articular cartilage lesions are frequent in football players, but evidence for the most suitable surgical treatments is lacking. The aim of this International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society, Fédération Internationale de Football Association and Aspetar (ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar) consensus was to develop expert-based, patient-specific practical recommendations on the appropriateness of surgical treatments for symptomatic knee articular cartilage lesions in competitive football players. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used by 17 voting experts to provide recommendations on the suitability of six different surgical procedures (debridement, debridement+orthobiologics, bone marrow stimulation procedures, osteochondral autograft transplantation, allografts, and regenerative procedures) depending on four key clinical considerations: lesion location, defect size, bone involvement, and patient preference towards higher priority for a quick return to play or long-term results. These resulted in 96 scenarios (16 clinical scenarios for six surgical procedures). Altogether, in 94% of clinical scenarios, at least one surgical procedure was considered appropriate. Patient preference had the highest influence on the results. Debridement plus orthobiologics was most often considered appropriate in patients preferring a quick return to play, while regenerative techniques were more often considered appropriate with patients prioritising long-term results. Osteochondral autograft transplantation and allografts were considered appropriate only in selected scenarios, whereas bone marrow stimulation procedures were considered inappropriate or uncertain. The recommendations established by this ICRS-FIFA-Aspetar consensus on the appropriateness of different surgical procedures to treat symptomatic articular cartilage lesions in competitive football players should be used as broad guidelines, but the preferred treatment should be player-specific.

British Journal of Sports Medicine
OTH Regensburg (DE), Humanitas University (IT), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (CH), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Cedars-Sinai Kerlan-Jobe Institute (US), Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia (PE), Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital (QA), Department of Medical Sciences (RU), Osaka Health Science University (JP), UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik (AT), Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona (ES), The Geneva Association (CH), Province of Antwerp (BE), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), Espregueira Mendes Clinic (PT), Osaka Prefectural Government (JP), Centre Orthopédique Santy (FR), Sports Science Institute of South Africa (ZA), Fortius Clinic (GB), Gelenkpunkt (AT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute (AU), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH), University of California, Davis (US), University of Minho (PT)
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.