Development and internal validation of a clinical–CT model for differentiating intestinal-type from pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinomas exhibit distinct biological behaviours and prognostic outcomes, yet accurate preoperative subtyping remains a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the value of clinical variables and computed tomography (CT) imaging features in the differential diagnosis of intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma, and to develop a subtype prediction model. METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with pathologically confirmed periampullary carcinoma, comprising 21 intestinal-type and 62 pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinomas. Clinical variables and conventional CT imaging features were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify predictors associated with PAC subtype. Based on these predictors, clinical, radiologic, and combined prediction models were developed, and a nomogram was constructed from the combined model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The DeLong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among different models. RESULTS: The AUCs of the clinical model and radiologic model were 0.82 (95%CI, 0.70-0.92) and 0.85 (95%CI, 0.79-0.93), respectively. The combined model showed significantly better diagnostic performance than either model alone, with an AUC of 0.92 (95%CI, 0.84-0.97), a sensitivity of 87.1%, and a specificity of 90.5%. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9, total bilirubin, tumor location, and enhancement degree of lesion were identified as the most important predictors in the combined model. In addition, the nomogram derived from the combined model demonstrated good discriminative ability for predicting histologic subtype. CONCLUSION: The combined model integrating clinical and CT imaging features enables more accurate preoperative differentiation between intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma and yields higher sensitivity and specificity than models based on clinical or imaging features alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04880-9
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and internal validation of a clinical–CT model for differentiating intestinal-type from pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma

Guo Yu, Yi-Xiang Wang, Zhong-Qiu Wang, Li Zhu et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Development and internal validation of a clinical–CT model for differentiating intestinal-type from pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma

Guo Yu, Yi-Xiang Wang, Zhong-Qiu Wang, Li Zhu, Yang-Jie Chen, Shuai Ren
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinomas exhibit distinct biological behaviours and prognostic outcomes, yet accurate preoperative subtyping remains a major clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the value of clinical variables and computed tomography (CT) imaging features in the differential diagnosis of intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma, and to develop a subtype prediction model. METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with pathologically confirmed periampullary carcinoma, comprising 21 intestinal-type and 62 pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinomas. Clinical variables and conventional CT imaging features were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify predictors associated with PAC subtype. Based on these predictors, clinical, radiologic, and combined prediction models were developed, and a nomogram was constructed from the combined model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The DeLong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among different models. RESULTS: The AUCs of the clinical model and radiologic model were 0.82 (95%CI, 0.70-0.92) and 0.85 (95%CI, 0.79-0.93), respectively. The combined model showed significantly better diagnostic performance than either model alone, with an AUC of 0.92 (95%CI, 0.84-0.97), a sensitivity of 87.1%, and a specificity of 90.5%. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9, total bilirubin, tumor location, and enhancement degree of lesion were identified as the most important predictors in the combined model. In addition, the nomogram derived from the combined model demonstrated good discriminative ability for predicting histologic subtype. CONCLUSION: The combined model integrating clinical and CT imaging features enables more accurate preoperative differentiation between intestinal-type and pancreatobiliary-type periampullary carcinoma and yields higher sensitivity and specificity than models based on clinical or imaging features alone.

BMC Gastroenterology
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.