Feasibility of forecasting self-injurious behavior among autistic youth using wearable sensors and machine learning models

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a substantial clinical challenge for many individuals on the autism spectrum, and support strategies are often only reactive. Forecasting of SIB could enable timely support, especially using wearable sensors, but its feasibility is not well understood. We evaluated SIB forecasting using a previously collected dataset (n = 9) comprising motion and physiological data. We compared the performance of four machine learning models-Random Forest, AdaBoost.M2, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a Double-Stacked LSTM-across five forecast horizons (3s to 120s) and three feature sets: Motion-Only (from accelerometers), Physiological-Only (e.g., heart rate, skin conductance), and Combined. Performance was measured with a range of metrics, using Leave-One-Subject-Out cross-validation. We found a significant main effect of forecast horizon on the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve; performance rose from near-chance at short horizons to having median scores above chance at one minute or longer. While aggregated results showed no significant differences between models or feature sets, subject-level analysis suggested predictive feasibility and that the optimal model configuration were highly person-specific. Our findings demonstrate that forecasting using wearable sensor data is feasible, but the substantial performance variability highlights a critical need for person-specific approaches to enable the development of clinically useful, proactive support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50079-z
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of forecasting self-injurious behavior among autistic youth using wearable sensors and machine learning models

Kristine D. Cantin-Garside, Maury A. Nussbaum, Sunwook Kim
Scientific Reports
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Feasibility of forecasting self-injurious behavior among autistic youth using wearable sensors and machine learning models

Kristine D. Cantin-Garside, Maury A. Nussbaum, Sunwook Kim
article en

Abstract

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a substantial clinical challenge for many individuals on the autism spectrum, and support strategies are often only reactive. Forecasting of SIB could enable timely support, especially using wearable sensors, but its feasibility is not well understood. We evaluated SIB forecasting using a previously collected dataset (n = 9) comprising motion and physiological data. We compared the performance of four machine learning models-Random Forest, AdaBoost.M2, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and a Double-Stacked LSTM-across five forecast horizons (3s to 120s) and three feature sets: Motion-Only (from accelerometers), Physiological-Only (e.g., heart rate, skin conductance), and Combined. Performance was measured with a range of metrics, using Leave-One-Subject-Out cross-validation. We found a significant main effect of forecast horizon on the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve; performance rose from near-chance at short horizons to having median scores above chance at one minute or longer. While aggregated results showed no significant differences between models or feature sets, subject-level analysis suggested predictive feasibility and that the optimal model configuration were highly person-specific. Our findings demonstrate that forecasting using wearable sensor data is feasible, but the substantial performance variability highlights a critical need for person-specific approaches to enable the development of clinically useful, proactive support systems.

Scientific Reports
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.