Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Products and Their Effects on Managerial Judgment, Strategy, and Organizational Performance

Despite growing organizational investment in artificial intelligence (AI), the mechanisms through which AI-enabled tools influence managerial judgment and translate into measurable performance outcomes remain theoretically underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by examining the relationships between AI adoption and usage, AI-influenced decision-making quality, and organizational performance across managerial levels and industry sectors. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 100 managers from six industries: technology, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, education, and retail. Three latent constructs—AI usage and perception, AI influence on decision-making, and organizational performance—were operationalized using multi-item Likert-scale instruments and tested for reliability. Hypotheses were evaluated using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, complemented by correlation and group-level comparative analyses across managerial hierarchies and AI adoption tenures. The findings support all proposed relationships. AI usage exhibits a strong positive association with decision-making quality, which in turn significantly predicts organizational performance. Additionally, AI usage has a direct effect on performance, indicating that decision-making quality partially mediates this relationship. Group-level analysis reveals variation in AI engagement and perceived impact across managerial levels and industries, with longer AI adoption tenure generally linked to stronger performance outcomes. From a practical standpoint, the results suggest that organizations must go beyond mere AI deployment and focus on enhancing managerial capability for AI-informed decision-making. Decision-making quality emerges as a critical pathway through which AI adoption drives performance gains, highlighting the importance of targeted training, integration infrastructure, and governance frameworks. This study contributes to the literature by empirically validating a model that links AI usage to organizational performance through the mediating role of managerial decision-making. By incorporating contextual variables such as managerial level, industry sector, and adoption tenure, the research provides a more nuanced understanding of how AI’s organizational impact varies across different settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19954536
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Products and Their Effects on Managerial Judgment, Strategy, and Organizational Performance

Monika N
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Products and Their Effects on Managerial Judgment, Strategy, and Organizational Performance

Monika N
article en

Abstract

Despite growing organizational investment in artificial intelligence (AI), the mechanisms through which AI-enabled tools influence managerial judgment and translate into measurable performance outcomes remain theoretically underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by examining the relationships between AI adoption and usage, AI-influenced decision-making quality, and organizational performance across managerial levels and industry sectors. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 100 managers from six industries: technology, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, education, and retail. Three latent constructs—AI usage and perception, AI influence on decision-making, and organizational performance—were operationalized using multi-item Likert-scale instruments and tested for reliability. Hypotheses were evaluated using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, complemented by correlation and group-level comparative analyses across managerial hierarchies and AI adoption tenures. The findings support all proposed relationships. AI usage exhibits a strong positive association with decision-making quality, which in turn significantly predicts organizational performance. Additionally, AI usage has a direct effect on performance, indicating that decision-making quality partially mediates this relationship. Group-level analysis reveals variation in AI engagement and perceived impact across managerial levels and industries, with longer AI adoption tenure generally linked to stronger performance outcomes. From a practical standpoint, the results suggest that organizations must go beyond mere AI deployment and focus on enhancing managerial capability for AI-informed decision-making. Decision-making quality emerges as a critical pathway through which AI adoption drives performance gains, highlighting the importance of targeted training, integration infrastructure, and governance frameworks. This study contributes to the literature by empirically validating a model that links AI usage to organizational performance through the mediating role of managerial decision-making. By incorporating contextual variables such as managerial level, industry sector, and adoption tenure, the research provides a more nuanced understanding of how AI’s organizational impact varies across different settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jain University (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.