Machine learning outperforms large language models for survival prediction in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

Accurate prognostic prediction remains a critical unmet need in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated value in outcome prediction, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform structured clinical prognostic tasks remains unclear. In this multicenter retrospective study, 1031 patients with HCC receiving interventional therapy combined with targeted treatment were analyzed and randomly divided into training (n = 717) and test (n = 314) cohorts. Six ML algorithms were developed and compared with two LLMs (ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-v3). Seven variables, including age, comorbidities, albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor burden, portal vein tumor thrombus, and alpha-fetoprotein level, were identified as key predictors. In the test cohort, SVM achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.658), followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.654), whereas LLMs showed limited discriminative ability (AUC = 0.590-0.591; P < 0.05 vs ML). ML models effectively stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different 1-year survival, while LLM-based predictions failed to distinguish outcomes. These findings indicate that ML models outperform current LLMs in structured prognostic prediction and provide more reliable support for risk stratification and clinical decision-making in advanced HCC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-50991-4
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning outperforms large language models for survival prediction in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

Fengtao Zhang, Huanzhang Niu, Kai Sun, Qingkang Zheng et al.
Scientific Reports
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Machine learning outperforms large language models for survival prediction in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

Fengtao Zhang, Huanzhang Niu, Kai Sun, Qingkang Zheng, Yangyang Li, Jiacheng Tan
article en

Abstract

Accurate prognostic prediction remains a critical unmet need in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated value in outcome prediction, the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform structured clinical prognostic tasks remains unclear. In this multicenter retrospective study, 1031 patients with HCC receiving interventional therapy combined with targeted treatment were analyzed and randomly divided into training (n = 717) and test (n = 314) cohorts. Six ML algorithms were developed and compared with two LLMs (ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-v3). Seven variables, including age, comorbidities, albumin-bilirubin grade, tumor burden, portal vein tumor thrombus, and alpha-fetoprotein level, were identified as key predictors. In the test cohort, SVM achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.658), followed by XGBoost (AUC = 0.654), whereas LLMs showed limited discriminative ability (AUC = 0.590-0.591; P < 0.05 vs ML). ML models effectively stratified patients into risk groups with significantly different 1-year survival, while LLM-based predictions failed to distinguish outcomes. These findings indicate that ML models outperform current LLMs in structured prognostic prediction and provide more reliable support for risk stratification and clinical decision-making in advanced HCC.

Scientific Reports
Shenzhen Sixth People's Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.