Effects of foot core training combined with hip and knee strengthening on patients with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with strength deficits and altered lower-limb kinematics. Impaired "foot-core" function and foot-ankle mechanics may contribute to altered patellofemoral joint loading, but the added value of combining foot-core training with conventional hip-knee strengthening remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of adding foot-core training to a hip-knee strengthening program on pain, function, strength, and three-dimensional step-down kinematics in individuals with PFP. METHODS: In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with PFP were randomly allocated to an experimental group (EG; foot-core plus hip-knee strengthening; age 23.89 ± 1.58 years) or a control group (CG; hip-knee strengthening; age 22.94 ± 2.11 years) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the worst pain during daily activities measured with a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale, AKPS), concentric isokinetic relative peak torque at 60°/s during hip extension/abduction and knee extension/flexion of the affected limb, and three-dimensional hip, knee, and ankle joint angles at initial contact (contralateral toe contact) during a single-leg step-down task. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post-intervention. RESULTS: EG demonstrated a greater reduction in post-intervention VAS than the CG (P = 0.022; ηp² = 0.135). AKPS was also higher in the EG than in the CG at post-intervention (P = 0.001; ηp² = 0.257). For step-down kinematics, the EG showed more favorable frontal-plane alignment than the CG, including lower hip adduction and knee valgus (both P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.676 and 0.525), and greater ankle dorsiflexion (P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.805). In isokinetic strength outcomes, the EG exceeded the CG in quadriceps and hip abductor relative peak torque (both P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.669 and 0.594), whereas hamstrings and hip extensors showed no between-group differences (P ≥ 0.398). CONCLUSION: Adding foot-core training to a hip-knee strengthening program resulted in small additional improvements in pain and function and produced larger between-group effects in selected kinematic variables and strength outcomes. The clinical significance of these biomechanical changes requires further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn. NO: ChiCTR2400087664. Date 01/08/2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09914-7
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of foot core training combined with hip and knee strengthening on patients with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial

Zheyu Xiong, Yonghuan Xiao
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Effects of foot core training combined with hip and knee strengthening on patients with patellofemoral pain: a randomized controlled trial

Zheyu Xiong, Yonghuan Xiao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common musculoskeletal condition associated with strength deficits and altered lower-limb kinematics. Impaired "foot-core" function and foot-ankle mechanics may contribute to altered patellofemoral joint loading, but the added value of combining foot-core training with conventional hip-knee strengthening remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of adding foot-core training to a hip-knee strengthening program on pain, function, strength, and three-dimensional step-down kinematics in individuals with PFP. METHODS: In this assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with PFP were randomly allocated to an experimental group (EG; foot-core plus hip-knee strengthening; age 23.89 ± 1.58 years) or a control group (CG; hip-knee strengthening; age 22.94 ± 2.11 years) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the worst pain during daily activities measured with a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were function (Anterior Knee Pain Scale, AKPS), concentric isokinetic relative peak torque at 60°/s during hip extension/abduction and knee extension/flexion of the affected limb, and three-dimensional hip, knee, and ankle joint angles at initial contact (contralateral toe contact) during a single-leg step-down task. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post-intervention. RESULTS: EG demonstrated a greater reduction in post-intervention VAS than the CG (P = 0.022; ηp² = 0.135). AKPS was also higher in the EG than in the CG at post-intervention (P = 0.001; ηp² = 0.257). For step-down kinematics, the EG showed more favorable frontal-plane alignment than the CG, including lower hip adduction and knee valgus (both P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.676 and 0.525), and greater ankle dorsiflexion (P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.805). In isokinetic strength outcomes, the EG exceeded the CG in quadriceps and hip abductor relative peak torque (both P < 0.001; ηp² = 0.669 and 0.594), whereas hamstrings and hip extensors showed no between-group differences (P ≥ 0.398). CONCLUSION: Adding foot-core training to a hip-knee strengthening program resulted in small additional improvements in pain and function and produced larger between-group effects in selected kinematic variables and strength outcomes. The clinical significance of these biomechanical changes requires further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn. NO: ChiCTR2400087664. Date 01/08/2024.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Hebei University of Engineering (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.