Including advanced thermochemical technologies in comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of municipal organic waste management systems: A systematic review

Recently, municipalities worldwide have implemented selective collection systems for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) to avoid the environmental impacts from landfilling organic matter and to promote resource recovery. Currently, biological methods such as anaerobic digestion (AD) predominate in source-separated OFMSW treatment. However, advanced thermochemical approaches - such as pyrolysis - have recently attracted considerable interest for treating OFMSW. While they offer some advantages over biological treatments, the environmental performance of advanced thermochemical technologies must be thoroughly compared with other available alternatives to guide science-based decision-making. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a well-established and comprehensive tool to evaluate the environmental sustainability of waste management systems. However, LCA results often vary considerably due to differences in methodological choices and system boundaries. To provide recommendations for future studies and a basis for standardisation, this review aims to identify and critically analyse the most common methodological choices in comparative LCAs of OFMSW management systems that include at least one advanced thermochemical route in their scope. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement, this review examines 19 peer-reviewed articles encompassing 65 distinct technological scenarios. The results show that, in general, advanced thermochemical technologies integrated with AD perform best in terms of global warming potential (GWP), but when considering other impact categories, trade-offs arise. Additionally, we evidence that system boundaries have usually failed to encompass the full complexity of OFMSW management systems. Moreover, the main approaches to solving multifunctionality and modelling environmental credits from co-products are discussed and, in some cases, challenged. Finally, recommendations for future research are given.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115537
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Including advanced thermochemical technologies in comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of municipal organic waste management systems: A systematic review

Stefan Salhofer, Víctor González-Mallén
Waste Management
Municipal Solid Waste Management
article

Including advanced thermochemical technologies in comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of municipal organic waste management systems: A systematic review

Stefan Salhofer, Víctor González-Mallén
article en

Abstract

Recently, municipalities worldwide have implemented selective collection systems for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) to avoid the environmental impacts from landfilling organic matter and to promote resource recovery. Currently, biological methods such as anaerobic digestion (AD) predominate in source-separated OFMSW treatment. However, advanced thermochemical approaches - such as pyrolysis - have recently attracted considerable interest for treating OFMSW. While they offer some advantages over biological treatments, the environmental performance of advanced thermochemical technologies must be thoroughly compared with other available alternatives to guide science-based decision-making. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a well-established and comprehensive tool to evaluate the environmental sustainability of waste management systems. However, LCA results often vary considerably due to differences in methodological choices and system boundaries. To provide recommendations for future studies and a basis for standardisation, this review aims to identify and critically analyse the most common methodological choices in comparative LCAs of OFMSW management systems that include at least one advanced thermochemical route in their scope. Conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement, this review examines 19 peer-reviewed articles encompassing 65 distinct technological scenarios. The results show that, in general, advanced thermochemical technologies integrated with AD perform best in terms of global warming potential (GWP), but when considering other impact categories, trade-offs arise. Additionally, we evidence that system boundaries have usually failed to encompass the full complexity of OFMSW management systems. Moreover, the main approaches to solving multifunctionality and modelling environmental credits from co-products are discussed and, in some cases, challenged. Finally, recommendations for future research are given.

Waste ManagementVol. 219
University of Eastern Finland (FI), BOKU University (AT)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.