Efficacy of rebamipide for the treatment of dry eye disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial ocular surface disorder characterized by tear film instability and inflammation. Rebamipide 2% ophthalmic suspension, a mucin secretagogue, has been investigated as a potential treatment due to its unique mechanism targeting mucin deficiency and ocular surface repair. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between January 2013 and March 2025. Non-randomized and randomized controlled trials evaluating topical 2% rebamipide in patients with DED were included. Outcomes assessed included tear breakup time, Schirmer I test, fluorescein staining scores, ocular surface disease index, and adverse events. Data were synthesized using standard meta-analytic techniques and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, including both randomized and non-randomized trials, were analyzed, comprising a total of 575 participants. Meta-analysis showed that rebamipide nonsignificantly increased tear breakup time at 2 weeks (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.94 to 3.03; P = .30; I2 = 89.3%), significant at 4 weeks (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.74-1.64; P < .0001; I2 = 85%) and nonsignificant at 12 weeks (SMD = 0.97; 95% CI:-0.15 to 2.08; P = .09; I2 = 80.1%) indicating enhanced tear film stability. Schirmer I test values showed no significant improvement (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: -0.35-0.43; P = .83), suggesting limited effect on aqueous tear production. Fluorescein staining scores showed a reduction approaching statistical significance (SMD = -0.68; P = .051), while symptom scores measured by ocular surface disease index trended toward improvement, also approaching significance (SMD = -1.17; P = .055). Subgroup analyses revealed greater efficacy in contact lens wearers and postsurgical patients. Safety analysis indicated excellent tolerability, with a high adherence rate (96.8%) and only mild adverse effects such as dysgeusia and nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSION: Rebamipide 2% ophthalmic suspension improves tear stability and ocular surface health in mucin-deficient DED with a favorable safety profile. Further high-quality trials in diverse populations are warranted to confirm its role in global clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048424
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of rebamipide for the treatment of dry eye disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

Umar Farooque, Syeda Hafsa Qadri, S Asghar Ali, Nazeer Ahmed et al.
Medicine
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Efficacy of rebamipide for the treatment of dry eye disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials

Umar Farooque, Syeda Hafsa Qadri, S Asghar Ali, Nazeer Ahmed, Maria Rasool, Meer Murtaza, Asia Batool, Tirath Patel, Makhzan Ali Akbar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial ocular surface disorder characterized by tear film instability and inflammation. Rebamipide 2% ophthalmic suspension, a mucin secretagogue, has been investigated as a potential treatment due to its unique mechanism targeting mucin deficiency and ocular surface repair. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published between January 2013 and March 2025. Non-randomized and randomized controlled trials evaluating topical 2% rebamipide in patients with DED were included. Outcomes assessed included tear breakup time, Schirmer I test, fluorescein staining scores, ocular surface disease index, and adverse events. Data were synthesized using standard meta-analytic techniques and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, including both randomized and non-randomized trials, were analyzed, comprising a total of 575 participants. Meta-analysis showed that rebamipide nonsignificantly increased tear breakup time at 2 weeks (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI):-0.94 to 3.03; P = .30; I2 = 89.3%), significant at 4 weeks (SMD = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.74-1.64; P < .0001; I2 = 85%) and nonsignificant at 12 weeks (SMD = 0.97; 95% CI:-0.15 to 2.08; P = .09; I2 = 80.1%) indicating enhanced tear film stability. Schirmer I test values showed no significant improvement (SMD = 0.04; 95% CI: -0.35-0.43; P = .83), suggesting limited effect on aqueous tear production. Fluorescein staining scores showed a reduction approaching statistical significance (SMD = -0.68; P = .051), while symptom scores measured by ocular surface disease index trended toward improvement, also approaching significance (SMD = -1.17; P = .055). Subgroup analyses revealed greater efficacy in contact lens wearers and postsurgical patients. Safety analysis indicated excellent tolerability, with a high adherence rate (96.8%) and only mild adverse effects such as dysgeusia and nasopharyngitis. CONCLUSION: Rebamipide 2% ophthalmic suspension improves tear stability and ocular surface health in mucin-deficient DED with a favorable safety profile. Further high-quality trials in diverse populations are warranted to confirm its role in global clinical practice.

MedicineVol. 105(18)
North Sichuan Medical University (CN), Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK), Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (PK), King Edward Medical University (PK), University of Karachi (PK), Trinity School of Medicine (VC), Sir Syed University of Engineering and Technology (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Health Education England (GB), Health Education North West (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.