Effect of flywheel resistance training on change of direction performance in team sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Change of direction (CoD) ability is a key determinant of performance in team sports. Flywheel resistance training (FRT) has been proposed as an effective modality to improve CoD performance due to its emphasis on eccentric overload. This system review evaluates the effectiveness of FRT in enhancing CoD performance among team sports athletes. METHODS: We followed PRISMA 2020. SPORTDiscus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through January 1, 2024 (Google Scholar screened for additional records). Eligible studies were randomized controlled or randomized crossover trials in team sport athletes, comparing FRT with non-flywheel comparators, with ≥4 weeks duration and at least 1 CoD outcome. Standardized mean differences (Hedges g) with 95% CIs were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity (I2). Egger's test for small-study effects was performed when k ≥ 10. Study quality was appraised with the National Institutes of Health tool. RESULTS: Meta-analysis revealed a significant enhancement in CoD performance following FRT compared to control interventions (effect size [ES] = -0.62). Notably, FRT exhibited greater efficacy among adult athletes (ES = -1.07; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.64) in contrast to those aged under 16 (ES = 0.16; 95% CI = -0.56, 0.89). Additionally, training frequencies of <2 sessions per week demonstrated a more substantial effect (ES = -1.18; 95% CI = -1.71, -0.64) compared to more frequent sessions (ES = -0.37; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.18). Moreover, extended training durations exceeding 8 weeks yielded superior outcomes (ES = -1.46; 95% CI = -2.04, -0.88) compared to shorter durations (ES = -0.44; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.04). Evaluation tests such as the T-test (ES = -2.10; 95% CI = -3.43, -0.77), Illinois agility test (ES = -1.19; 95% CI = -1.80, -0.57), and V-cut test (ES = -0.65; 95% CI = -0.96, -0.33) exhibited superior sensitivity in detecting CoD improvements over the shuttle run test (ES = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.82, 0.29). CONCLUSION: FRT is an effective strategy for improving CoD performance in team sport athletes, particularly when implemented with lower frequency and longer duration. The observed benefits are likely attributed to enhanced eccentric strength, neuromuscular efficiency, and braking capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048524
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of flywheel resistance training on change of direction performance in team sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jing Mi, Junxin Zhang, Ruidong Liu
Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

Effect of flywheel resistance training on change of direction performance in team sports: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jing Mi, Junxin Zhang, Ruidong Liu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Change of direction (CoD) ability is a key determinant of performance in team sports. Flywheel resistance training (FRT) has been proposed as an effective modality to improve CoD performance due to its emphasis on eccentric overload. This system review evaluates the effectiveness of FRT in enhancing CoD performance among team sports athletes. METHODS: We followed PRISMA 2020. SPORTDiscus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through January 1, 2024 (Google Scholar screened for additional records). Eligible studies were randomized controlled or randomized crossover trials in team sport athletes, comparing FRT with non-flywheel comparators, with ≥4 weeks duration and at least 1 CoD outcome. Standardized mean differences (Hedges g) with 95% CIs were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models according to heterogeneity (I2). Egger's test for small-study effects was performed when k ≥ 10. Study quality was appraised with the National Institutes of Health tool. RESULTS: Meta-analysis revealed a significant enhancement in CoD performance following FRT compared to control interventions (effect size [ES] = -0.62). Notably, FRT exhibited greater efficacy among adult athletes (ES = -1.07; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.64) in contrast to those aged under 16 (ES = 0.16; 95% CI = -0.56, 0.89). Additionally, training frequencies of <2 sessions per week demonstrated a more substantial effect (ES = -1.18; 95% CI = -1.71, -0.64) compared to more frequent sessions (ES = -0.37; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.18). Moreover, extended training durations exceeding 8 weeks yielded superior outcomes (ES = -1.46; 95% CI = -2.04, -0.88) compared to shorter durations (ES = -0.44; 95% CI = -0.93, 0.04). Evaluation tests such as the T-test (ES = -2.10; 95% CI = -3.43, -0.77), Illinois agility test (ES = -1.19; 95% CI = -1.80, -0.57), and V-cut test (ES = -0.65; 95% CI = -0.96, -0.33) exhibited superior sensitivity in detecting CoD improvements over the shuttle run test (ES = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.82, 0.29). CONCLUSION: FRT is an effective strategy for improving CoD performance in team sport athletes, particularly when implemented with lower frequency and longer duration. The observed benefits are likely attributed to enhanced eccentric strength, neuromuscular efficiency, and braking capacity.

MedicineVol. 105(18)
General Administration of Sport of China (CN), Beijing Sport University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.