Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis, the body's life-threatening response to infection, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution urging member states to recognize sepsis as a public health priority. Our objective was to identify and describe sepsis policies, guidelines, and health professional training standards in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review and an environmental scan, including systematic searches of published and grey literature. Policies, guidelines, or training standards related to identifying, managing, or reporting sepsis, published since 2010 and available in English/French, were included. We extracted data on the organization(s) involved in the development, information on the source, including the target patient population, measures of inclusive engagement, and whether the source considered at-risk, equity-denied, and/or Indigenous communities. RESULTS: We identified 32 sources of evidence, including sepsis policies or guidelines for 38% (5/13) of provinces and territories, the inclusion of sepsis as a training competency in 16% (11/67) of the Royal College of Canada medical specialties/subspecialties competency standards, and two Canadian Hospital Accreditation Standards. Only 6% (2/32) of the sources considered the role of social determinants of health, and 13% (4/32) engaged individuals with lived sepsis experience or members of the public. CONCLUSIONS: We identified existing sepsis policies, guidelines, and standards that reveal significant gaps across provinces and territories, particularly the lack of attention to social determinants of health and the exclusion of individuals with lived experience. Coordinated national policy efforts are urgently needed to reduce the burden of sepsis in Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14646-4
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review

Kali Barrett, Kathryn Hendrick, L Mbuagbaw, Kristine Russell et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review

Kali Barrett, Kathryn Hendrick, L Mbuagbaw, Kristine Russell, Jennifer Walker, Osama Loubani, Victoria Chechulina, Fatima Sheikh, Nick Daneman, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Lisa Schwartz, Niranjan Kissoon, Gary Garber
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis, the body's life-threatening response to infection, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution urging member states to recognize sepsis as a public health priority. Our objective was to identify and describe sepsis policies, guidelines, and health professional training standards in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review and an environmental scan, including systematic searches of published and grey literature. Policies, guidelines, or training standards related to identifying, managing, or reporting sepsis, published since 2010 and available in English/French, were included. We extracted data on the organization(s) involved in the development, information on the source, including the target patient population, measures of inclusive engagement, and whether the source considered at-risk, equity-denied, and/or Indigenous communities. RESULTS: We identified 32 sources of evidence, including sepsis policies or guidelines for 38% (5/13) of provinces and territories, the inclusion of sepsis as a training competency in 16% (11/67) of the Royal College of Canada medical specialties/subspecialties competency standards, and two Canadian Hospital Accreditation Standards. Only 6% (2/32) of the sources considered the role of social determinants of health, and 13% (4/32) engaged individuals with lived sepsis experience or members of the public. CONCLUSIONS: We identified existing sepsis policies, guidelines, and standards that reveal significant gaps across provinces and territories, particularly the lack of attention to social determinants of health and the exclusion of individuals with lived experience. Coordinated national policy efforts are urgently needed to reduce the burden of sepsis in Canada.

BMC Health Services Research
Medical Council of Canada (CA), Western University (CA), Dalhousie University (CA), Western Cape Department of Health (ZA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University Health Network (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Population Health Research Institute (CA), Canadian Medical Protective Association (CA), Central Hospital of Yaoundé (CM), Public Health Ontario (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), BC Innovation Council (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.