Category specificity in holistic processing: Reciprocal face–word interference does not extend to body stimuli

This study examined the category specificity of a previously reported reciprocal interference between holistic face and word processing by incorporating body stimuli as a control. Prior work has demonstrated that superimposed faces and words disrupt each other's holistic processing: faces are processed less holistically when paired with aligned words, and vice versa. Here, we asked whether a similar pattern of interference extends to body stimuli. In Experiment 1, we assessed whether face alignment would influence holistic body processing. We found no difference in holistic body processing between face-aligned and face-misaligned conditions, suggesting that faces do not interfere with holistic body processing. In Experiment 2, we examined whether word alignment affected body processing and again found no evidence of interference. Together, these findings indicate that body processing is unaffected by the alignment of overlaid words or faces, highlighting both the specificity and the limits of shared holistic processing mechanisms across high-level visual categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-026-03270-3
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Category specificity in holistic processing: Reciprocal face–word interference does not extend to body stimuli

Alexandre Pereira, Tina T. Liu, Paulo Ventura
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Category specificity in holistic processing: Reciprocal face–word interference does not extend to body stimuli

Alexandre Pereira, Tina T. Liu, Paulo Ventura
article en

Abstract

This study examined the category specificity of a previously reported reciprocal interference between holistic face and word processing by incorporating body stimuli as a control. Prior work has demonstrated that superimposed faces and words disrupt each other's holistic processing: faces are processed less holistically when paired with aligned words, and vice versa. Here, we asked whether a similar pattern of interference extends to body stimuli. In Experiment 1, we assessed whether face alignment would influence holistic body processing. We found no difference in holistic body processing between face-aligned and face-misaligned conditions, suggesting that faces do not interfere with holistic body processing. In Experiment 2, we examined whether word alignment affected body processing and again found no evidence of interference. Together, these findings indicate that body processing is unaffected by the alignment of overlaid words or faces, highlighting both the specificity and the limits of shared holistic processing mechanisms across high-level visual categories.

Attention Perception & PsychophysicsVol. 88(5)
University of Lisbon (PT), Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Universidade Europeia (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Universidade de Lisboa, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.