Performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician

More than 65 years ago, complex clinical diagnostic reasoning cases were introduced as the gold standard for the evaluation of expert medical computing systems, a standard that has held ever since. In this study, we report the results of a physician evaluation of a large language model (LLM) on challenging clinical cases across five experiments with a baseline of hundreds of physicians. We then report a real-world study comparing human expert and artificial intelligence (AI) second opinions in randomly selected patients in the emergency room of a major tertiary academic medical center. In all experiments, the LLM outperformed physician baselines and displayed continued improvement from prior generations of AI clinical decision support. Our study suggests that LLMs have eclipsed most benchmarks of clinical reasoning, motivating the urgent need for prospective trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adz4433
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
89.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician

Peter G. Brodeur, Jason A. Freed, Daniele Restifo, Arjun K. Manrai et al.
3 citations
Science
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
89.50
article

Performance of a large language model on the reasoning tasks of a physician

Peter G. Brodeur, Jason A. Freed, Daniele Restifo, Arjun K. Manrai, Adrian D. Haimovich, Stephanie Cabral, Zahir Kanjee, Priyank Jain, M. Fotoohi, Evelyn Ling, Daniel Restrepo, Matthew Gwiazdon, Haadi Mombini, Jonathan Chen, Raja-Elie Abdulnour, Andrew Olson, Ethan Goh, Daniel J Morgan, Jason Hom, Robert Gallo, Liam G McCoy, Thomas A Buckley, Christopher Lucas, Adam Rodman, Eric Horvitz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

More than 65 years ago, complex clinical diagnostic reasoning cases were introduced as the gold standard for the evaluation of expert medical computing systems, a standard that has held ever since. In this study, we report the results of a physician evaluation of a large language model (LLM) on challenging clinical cases across five experiments with a baseline of hundreds of physicians. We then report a real-world study comparing human expert and artificial intelligence (AI) second opinions in randomly selected patients in the emergency room of a major tertiary academic medical center. In all experiments, the LLM outperformed physician baselines and displayed continued improvement from prior generations of AI clinical decision support. Our study suggests that LLMs have eclipsed most benchmarks of clinical reasoning, motivating the urgent need for prospective trials.

ScienceVol. 392(6797)
Cambridge Health Alliance (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Microsoft (United States) (US), San Francisco General Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Alberta (CA), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Lahey Medical Center (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Stanford Medicine (US), VA Maryland Health Care System (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Stanford University (US)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, Harvard Medical School, National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
89.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.