Helpful if “Medication took up more space in the course!” – a mixed methods study about pharmacotherapeutic knowledge and digital quizzes for learning and assessment in the medical programme

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy and prescribing are core skills for physicians, and all medical graduates must master the basics. From a medical education perspective, it is important to understand factors that help students attain sufficient skills for safe and effective prescribing. In this study, we evaluated autograded pharmacotherapeutic quizzes for practice and summative assessments in two undergraduate clinical courses and explored medical students' views on educational components they considered helpful in learning to treat patients with medications. METHODS: Pharmacotherapeutic quizzes were implemented in two steps across two course instances for two clinical courses (Psychiatry and Neurology, seventh semester in the medical programme at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden). In step I, voluntary practice quizzes and a summative assessment test were introduced. In step II, clinical contexts for the quiz questions were provided, and the summative test was expanded. The students' achieved level of knowledge post-course was investigated before and after each step, using an anonymous voluntary knowledge evaluation test including 20 case-based single best answer (SBA) questions. Based on free-text replies to a concurrent questionnaire on students' views on learning pharmacotherapy, a manifest content analysis was performed, guided by the research question "What in their education do medical students consider important in enabling them to treat patients with medications?" Meaning units were extracted, and emergent categories and themes identified. RESULTS: In total, 274 out of 404 course participants took the knowledge evaluation test and completed the questionnaire (response rate: 68%; 56% women; 66% ≤24 years old). Compared with pre-quiz results (median correct answers out of 20 SBA questions = 10 (lower to upper quartile 9-13)), no difference was seen after step I (11 (8-13) correct answers; P = 0.88) but a clear improvement was seen after step II (14 (12-16); P < 0.0001). In the qualitative analysis, four themes emerged: Curriculum, Clinical placement, Theoretical teaching and Student responsibility. The second theme, including the categories Preparation, Participation and Performance, was particularly prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Elaborated quizzes about medications, for practice and summative assessment, may increase pharmacotherapeutic knowledge in medical students. The four emergent themes regarding what students consider important can guide future course developments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09292-7
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Helpful if “Medication took up more space in the course!” – a mixed methods study about pharmacotherapeutic knowledge and digital quizzes for learning and assessment in the medical programme

K Jood, S Steingrimsson, F Bergquist, S M Wallerstedt et al.
BMC Medical Education
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Helpful if “Medication took up more space in the course!” – a mixed methods study about pharmacotherapeutic knowledge and digital quizzes for learning and assessment in the medical programme

K Jood, S Steingrimsson, F Bergquist, S M Wallerstedt, J Zelano, E Wentz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacotherapy and prescribing are core skills for physicians, and all medical graduates must master the basics. From a medical education perspective, it is important to understand factors that help students attain sufficient skills for safe and effective prescribing. In this study, we evaluated autograded pharmacotherapeutic quizzes for practice and summative assessments in two undergraduate clinical courses and explored medical students' views on educational components they considered helpful in learning to treat patients with medications. METHODS: Pharmacotherapeutic quizzes were implemented in two steps across two course instances for two clinical courses (Psychiatry and Neurology, seventh semester in the medical programme at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden). In step I, voluntary practice quizzes and a summative assessment test were introduced. In step II, clinical contexts for the quiz questions were provided, and the summative test was expanded. The students' achieved level of knowledge post-course was investigated before and after each step, using an anonymous voluntary knowledge evaluation test including 20 case-based single best answer (SBA) questions. Based on free-text replies to a concurrent questionnaire on students' views on learning pharmacotherapy, a manifest content analysis was performed, guided by the research question "What in their education do medical students consider important in enabling them to treat patients with medications?" Meaning units were extracted, and emergent categories and themes identified. RESULTS: In total, 274 out of 404 course participants took the knowledge evaluation test and completed the questionnaire (response rate: 68%; 56% women; 66% ≤24 years old). Compared with pre-quiz results (median correct answers out of 20 SBA questions = 10 (lower to upper quartile 9-13)), no difference was seen after step I (11 (8-13) correct answers; P = 0.88) but a clear improvement was seen after step II (14 (12-16); P < 0.0001). In the qualitative analysis, four themes emerged: Curriculum, Clinical placement, Theoretical teaching and Student responsibility. The second theme, including the categories Preparation, Participation and Performance, was particularly prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Elaborated quizzes about medications, for practice and summative assessment, may increase pharmacotherapeutic knowledge in medical students. The four emergent themes regarding what students consider important can guide future course developments.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Göteborgs Universitet
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.