Evaluation of the quality of information on gouty arthritis on Chinese internet platforms: A cross-sectional comparative analysis

Acute gout attacks cause severe pain, and short-video platforms have become patients' primary source of information. However, the quality and reliability of this information are increasingly concerning. This study will systematically evaluate the information quality of gouty arthritis-related content on Bilibili and TikTok video-sharing platforms, along with factors influencing video quality. This study systematically evaluated the quality and reliability of 100 popular gout-related videos each from Bilibili and TikTok. Video quality and reliability were assessed using the global quality score, Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), JAMA Benchmark Standard, and Hexagonal Radar Schema (HRS) tools. Correlations between video quality and metrics such as likes, comments, saves, and shares were also analyzed. Results showed median scores across 4 metrics on Bilibili: global quality score 3.0 (2.00, 4.00), mDISCERN3..0 (3.00, 4.00), JAMA 3.0 (2.00, 3.00), HRS 5.0 (4.00, 6.00); TikTok's corresponding scores were 3.0 (IQR 3.00-4.00), 3.0 (IQR 3.00-4.00), 3.0 (IQR 3.00-3.75), and 3.0 (IQR 2.00-4.50). Although Bilibili's HRS scores were higher than TikTok's, video quality was generally poor across both platforms. Furthermore, the study found a positive correlation between video length and quality. Increased likes and shares may not always reflect improved video quality, as these metrics can be influenced by the entertainment nature of online videos and may not fully indicate quality. Our research indicates that the health information short videos related to gouty arthritis on Bilibili and TikTok have poor quality, but the videos uploaded by medical professionals are considered reliable in terms of comprehensiveness and content quality. Health information seekers must carefully evaluate the scientific accuracy and reliability of short videos providing medical information on Bilibili and TikTok before making healthcare decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048496
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the quality of information on gouty arthritis on Chinese internet platforms: A cross-sectional comparative analysis

Haitao Wang, Jiaming Liang, Jiaqi Guo, Chun Yang et al.
Medicine
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Evaluation of the quality of information on gouty arthritis on Chinese internet platforms: A cross-sectional comparative analysis

Haitao Wang, Jiaming Liang, Jiaqi Guo, Chun Yang, Jiabo Zhu, Shuohang Zhang, Liyan Zhang, Yingqi Gao
article en

Abstract

Acute gout attacks cause severe pain, and short-video platforms have become patients' primary source of information. However, the quality and reliability of this information are increasingly concerning. This study will systematically evaluate the information quality of gouty arthritis-related content on Bilibili and TikTok video-sharing platforms, along with factors influencing video quality. This study systematically evaluated the quality and reliability of 100 popular gout-related videos each from Bilibili and TikTok. Video quality and reliability were assessed using the global quality score, Modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), JAMA Benchmark Standard, and Hexagonal Radar Schema (HRS) tools. Correlations between video quality and metrics such as likes, comments, saves, and shares were also analyzed. Results showed median scores across 4 metrics on Bilibili: global quality score 3.0 (2.00, 4.00), mDISCERN3..0 (3.00, 4.00), JAMA 3.0 (2.00, 3.00), HRS 5.0 (4.00, 6.00); TikTok's corresponding scores were 3.0 (IQR 3.00-4.00), 3.0 (IQR 3.00-4.00), 3.0 (IQR 3.00-3.75), and 3.0 (IQR 2.00-4.50). Although Bilibili's HRS scores were higher than TikTok's, video quality was generally poor across both platforms. Furthermore, the study found a positive correlation between video length and quality. Increased likes and shares may not always reflect improved video quality, as these metrics can be influenced by the entertainment nature of online videos and may not fully indicate quality. Our research indicates that the health information short videos related to gouty arthritis on Bilibili and TikTok have poor quality, but the videos uploaded by medical professionals are considered reliable in terms of comprehensiveness and content quality. Health information seekers must carefully evaluate the scientific accuracy and reliability of short videos providing medical information on Bilibili and TikTok before making healthcare decisions.

MedicineVol. 105(18)
Beihua University (CN), Harbin Medical University (CN), Jilin Medical University (CN), Ningbo University Affiliated Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.